DOJ-OGR-00017935.json 4.2 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "62",
  4. "document_number": "747",
  5. "date": "08/10/2022",
  6. "document_type": "Court Transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 62 of 228\nLC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct\n1 that when we talk -- there are a lot of studies that are done,\n2 national studies, interviewing, say, adults, asking about a\n3 whole range of experiences that they've had during the course\n4 of their lifetime. And that research has repeatedly\n5 demonstrated that when people -- when you ask people if they\n6 acknowledge that they've been abused, particularly sexually\n7 abused, during childhood, and then you ask them if they ever\n8 told anyone, a significant number will say no, not until this\n9 interview. And then others will say yes, and then they are\n10 asked when they've told. And we know from the research that\n11 often they don't tell until adulthood.\n12 Q. In your clinical and forensic practices, have you treated\n13 and evaluated patients who did not disclose sexual abuse they\n14 experienced as children, but disclosed such abuse later?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Without getting into any particular anecdotes of your\n17 practices, can you explain.\n18 A. I'm sorry, can you repeat the question.\n19 Q. Yes. Can you just explain -- let me ask it this way: In\n20 your own clinical practice, how common, if at all, is it for\n21 you to be the first person your patients have told they were\n22 abused?\n23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this\n24 as not being relevant.\n25 THE COURT: Overruled. Thank you.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017935",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 62 of 228",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 that when we talk -- there are a lot of studies that are done,\n2 national studies, interviewing, say, adults, asking about a\n3 whole range of experiences that they've had during the course\n4 of their lifetime. And that research has repeatedly\n5 demonstrated that when people -- when you ask people if they\n6 acknowledge that they've been abused, particularly sexually\n7 abused, during childhood, and then you ask them if they ever\n8 told anyone, a significant number will say no, not until this\n9 interview. And then others will say yes, and then they are\n10 asked when they've told. And we know from the research that\n11 often they don't tell until adulthood.\n12 Q. In your clinical and forensic practices, have you treated\n13 and evaluated patients who did not disclose sexual abuse they\n14 experienced as children, but disclosed such abuse later?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Without getting into any particular anecdotes of your\n17 practices, can you explain.\n18 A. I'm sorry, can you repeat the question.\n19 Q. Yes. Can you just explain -- let me ask it this way: In\n20 your own clinical practice, how common, if at all, is it for\n21 you to be the first person your patients have told they were\n22 abused?\n23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this\n24 as not being relevant.\n25 THE COURT: Overruled. Thank you.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017935",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Rocchio",
  41. "PAGLIUCA"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "08/10/2022"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "747",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00017935"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with some indication of a witness being questioned. The footer contains information about the court reporter and a reference number."
  57. }