| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "4",
- "document_number": "60",
- "date": "09/24/2020",
- "document_type": "Table of Authorities",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page4 of 58\n\nTable of Authorities\n\nCases\n\nBond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 2009)...............................................20\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................4, 5, 10, 12\nCohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)...............................10\nFlanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984)...............................................12, 13, 14\nIn re City of N.Y., 607 F.3d 923 (2d Cir. 2010)..................................................20\nIn re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y., 745 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2014)................21\nIn re Telligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)..................................................3\nKoon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996)........................................................26\nLouis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2012) ..............28, 30\nMartindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) ..............................................................................passim\nMidland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794 (1989)..................................12\nMinpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1987) ................10\nPichler v. UNITE, 585 F.3d 741 (3d Cir. 2009)....................................................10\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993) ...10\nSEC v. Boock, No. 09 Civ. 8261(DLC), 2010 WL 2398918 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2010)...............................................................................30\nTrs. of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat'l Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D.N.Y.1995)......................................................28\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986)...........................................15, 16\niii\nDOJ-OGR-00019403",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page4 of 58",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Table of Authorities",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Cases",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Bond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 2009)...............................................20\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................4, 5, 10, 12\nCohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)...............................10\nFlanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984)...............................................12, 13, 14\nIn re City of N.Y., 607 F.3d 923 (2d Cir. 2010)..................................................20\nIn re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y., 745 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2014)................21\nIn re Telligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)..................................................3\nKoon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996)........................................................26\nLouis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2012) ..............28, 30\nMartindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) ..............................................................................passim\nMidland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794 (1989)..................................12\nMinpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1987) ................10\nPichler v. UNITE, 585 F.3d 741 (3d Cir. 2009)....................................................10\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993) ...10\nSEC v. Boock, No. 09 Civ. 8261(DLC), 2010 WL 2398918 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2010)...............................................................................30\nTrs. of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat'l Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D.N.Y.1995)......................................................28\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986)...........................................15, 16",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "iii",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019403",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [],
- "organizations": [
- "Utreras",
- "Maxwell",
- "Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.",
- "United States",
- "City of N.Y.",
- "Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y.",
- "Telligent, Inc.",
- "Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.",
- "LY USA, Inc.",
- "International Telephone and Telegraph Corp.",
- "Midland Asphalt Corp.",
- "Minpeco S.A.",
- "Conticommodity Servs., Inc.",
- "UNITE",
- "Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth.",
- "Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.",
- "SEC",
- "Boock",
- "Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat'l Pension Fund",
- "Transworld Mech., Inc.",
- "Caparros"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "N.Y.",
- "S.D.N.Y.",
- "Albany"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "09/24/2020",
- "2009",
- "2019",
- "1949",
- "1984",
- "2010",
- "2014",
- "2011",
- "1996",
- "2012",
- "1979",
- "1989",
- "1987",
- "1993",
- "June 15, 2010",
- "1995",
- "1986"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "20-3061",
- "60",
- "2938278",
- "4",
- "585 F.3d 1061",
- "929 F.3d 41",
- "337 U.S. 541",
- "465 U.S. 259",
- "607 F.3d 923",
- "745 F.3d 30",
- "640 F.3d 53",
- "518 U.S. 81",
- "676 F.3d 83",
- "594 F.2d 291",
- "489 U.S. 794",
- "832 F.2d 739",
- "585 F.3d 741",
- "506 U.S. 139",
- "09 Civ. 8261(DLC)",
- "886 F. Supp. 1134",
- "800 F.2d 23",
- "DOJ-OGR-00019403"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is a table of authorities from a legal case. It appears to be a printed document with no handwritten text or stamps. The text is clear and legible."
- }
|