DOJ-OGR-00008843.json 4.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "587",
  5. "date": "01/27/22",
  6. "document_type": "Letter",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 587 Filed 01/27/22 Page 1 of 4 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Suite 500 East 1301 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20005-3317 Nathan Siegel 202.973.4237 tel NathanSiegel@dwt.com January 26, 2022 VIA EMAIL AND FED EX The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2102 New York, NY 10007 Re: USA v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Dear Judge Nathan, I write on behalf of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (\"ABC News\") and NBCUniversal News Group (\"NBC News\") to join in the requests of The Miami Herald (Dkt. No. 581) and The New York Times to oppose the sealing of the motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits filed by the Defendant (Dkt. No. 578), for all the reasons set forth in those requests. ABC News and NBC News further respectfully request that Juror 50's motion to intervene, which according to this Court's prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 575 & 576) was e-mailed to the Court and placed under temporary seal, now be unsealed. Like the Defendant's Motion for a New Trial, Juror 50's motion is a \"judicial document\" to which the presumption of access under both the common law and the First Amendment applies because Juror 50's motion has been, and continues to be, highly \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process.\" U.S. v. Amadeo, 44 F. 3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995) (\"Amodeo I\"). DWT.COM Anchorage | Bellevue | Los Angeles | New York Portland | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington, D.C. 4863-7911-5787v.1 0019918-000033 DOJ-OGR-00008843",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 587 Filed 01/27/22 Page 1 of 4",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Suite 500 East 1301 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20005-3317 Nathan Siegel 202.973.4237 tel NathanSiegel@dwt.com",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "January 26, 2022",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "VIA EMAIL AND FED EX The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2102 New York, NY 10007 Re: USA v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Dear Judge Nathan,",
  30. "position": "top"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "I write on behalf of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (\"ABC News\") and NBCUniversal News Group (\"NBC News\") to join in the requests of The Miami Herald (Dkt. No. 581) and The New York Times to oppose the sealing of the motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits filed by the Defendant (Dkt. No. 578), for all the reasons set forth in those requests.",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "ABC News and NBC News further respectfully request that Juror 50's motion to intervene, which according to this Court's prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 575 & 576) was e-mailed to the Court and placed under temporary seal, now be unsealed. Like the Defendant's Motion for a New Trial, Juror 50's motion is a \"judicial document\" to which the presumption of access under both the common law and the First Amendment applies because Juror 50's motion has been, and continues to be, highly \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process.\" U.S. v. Amadeo, 44 F. 3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995) (\"Amodeo I\").",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DWT.COM Anchorage | Bellevue | Los Angeles | New York Portland | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington, D.C. 4863-7911-5787v.1 0019918-000033 DOJ-OGR-00008843",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Alison J. Nathan",
  51. "Nathan Siegel",
  52. "Maxwell"
  53. ],
  54. "organizations": [
  55. "Davis Wright Tremaine LLP",
  56. "American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.",
  57. "NBCUniversal News Group",
  58. "The Miami Herald",
  59. "The New York Times",
  60. "United States District Court",
  61. "Southern District of New York"
  62. ],
  63. "locations": [
  64. "Washington, D.C.",
  65. "New York"
  66. ],
  67. "dates": [
  68. "January 26, 2022",
  69. "01/27/22",
  70. "1995"
  71. ],
  72. "reference_numbers": [
  73. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  74. "Document 587",
  75. "Dkt. No. 581",
  76. "Dkt. No. 578",
  77. "Dkt. Nos. 575 & 576",
  78. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  79. "44 F. 3d 141",
  80. "4863-7911-5787v.1 0019918-000033",
  81. "DOJ-OGR-00008843"
  82. ]
  83. },
  84. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The letter is well-formatted and free of handwritten text or stamps."
  85. }