mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007110.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "59",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 59 of 127 59 LB15MAX2 1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 2 The category of exhibits that this witness would be 3 authenticating would include, among other things, contact 4 information for the minor victims and so the fact that that 5 contact information and messages from those victims was in 6 Mr. Epstein's residence and, in part, in the defendant's 7 possession is relevant regardless of the time frame and is 8 corroborative of the other evidence at trial. 9 THE COURT: The charged conspiracy ends and then 10 Mr. Epstein maintains addresses of individuals alleged to be 11 victims here. Is that the context? 12 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor; but more specifically with 13 respect to the two categories of exhibits, the first would 14 include messages that were left at the residence during the 15 time frame of the charged conspiracy, they are dated and 16 include a name of a victim and her contact information and so 17 this witness will be authenticating those. Those documents 18 come from the time frame of the charged conspiracy and were 19 created at the time frame of the charged conduct. 20 With respect to a second category of information -- 21 THE COURT: And you have a witness who would 22 authenticate that they were created at the time of the charged 23 conduct which, presumably, wouldn't be somebody who doesn't 24 come onto the scene until after the time period of the charged 25 conduct. Fair to say? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007110",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 59 of 127 59 LB15MAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 2 The category of exhibits that this witness would be 3 authenticating would include, among other things, contact 4 information for the minor victims and so the fact that that 5 contact information and messages from those victims was in 6 Mr. Epstein's residence and, in part, in the defendant's 7 possession is relevant regardless of the time frame and is 8 corroborative of the other evidence at trial. 9 THE COURT: The charged conspiracy ends and then 10 Mr. Epstein maintains addresses of individuals alleged to be 11 victims here. Is that the context? 12 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor; but more specifically with 13 respect to the two categories of exhibits, the first would 14 include messages that were left at the residence during the 15 time frame of the charged conspiracy, they are dated and 16 include a name of a victim and her contact information and so 17 this witness will be authenticating those. Those documents 18 come from the time frame of the charged conspiracy and were 19 created at the time frame of the charged conduct. 20 With respect to a second category of information -- 21 THE COURT: And you have a witness who would 22 authenticate that they were created at the time of the charged 23 conduct which, presumably, wouldn't be somebody who doesn't 24 come onto the scene until after the time period of the charged 25 conduct. Fair to say?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007110",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007110"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}