mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007540.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "47",
    "document_number": "499-1",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 47 of 375\n\nKaplan, R. L., Van Damme, I., Levine, L.J., & Loftus, E.F. (2016) Emotion and false memory. Emotion Review, 8, 8-13.\nLacey, C., & Loftus, E.F. (2016) History of forensic interviewing. In O'Donohue, W.T. & Fanetti, M.. (Eds). Forensic Interviews Regarding Child Sexual Abuse - A guide to evidence-based practice. NY Springer. (pp 1-17).\nDavis, D., & Loftus, E.F. (2016) Remembering disputed sexual encounters. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105, 811-851.\nLoftus, E.F. (2016) Memory Matters. In Sternberg, R., Fiske, S., Foss, D. (Eds) Scientists Making a Difference. NY: Cambridge University Press., p 136-139.\nZhu, B., Chen. C., Loftus, E.F., He, Q., Lei, X., Dong, Q, & Lin, C. (2016) Hippocampal size is related to short-term true and false memory, and right fusiform size is related to long-term true and false memory. Brain Structure & Function, 221, 4045-4057.\nLoftus, E. F. (2016) Illusions of Memory. Skeptical Inquirer, 40, 22-23. (Honorary Doctorate Acceptance Speech)\nFrenda, S.J., Berkowitz, S.R., Loftus, E.F., && Fenn, K.M. (2016) Sleep deprivation and false confessions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 2047-2050.\nCochran, K., Greenspan, R., Bogart, D., & Loftus, E.,F. (2016) Memory Blindness: Altered memory reports lead to distortions in eyewitness memory. Memory & Cognition, 44, 717-726.\nBerkowitz, S.R.. Frenda, S.J., Loftus, E.F., && Fenn, K.M (2016) Feeling sleepy? You might be at risk of falsely confessing to a crime you did not commit. The Conversation https: theconversation.com\nGrady, R.H., Butler, B.J. & Loftus, E.F. (2016) What should happen after an officer-involved shooting? Memory concerns in police reporting procedures. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 5, 246-251.\nNewman, E. J., Frenda, S.J. & Loftus, E.F. (2016) Memory as Reconstructive. In H.L. Miller,Jr.. (Ed) Sage Encyclopedia of Theory in Psychology. (Vol 2, p 545-549) Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage\nLoftus, E.F. (2016) To enhance justice: The risk and reward of studying memory. The Humanist (Isaac Asimov Science Award acceptance speech) vol 76, #6, p 29-32.\nLoftus, E.F., Doyle, J.M., & Dysart, J.E. (2016). Eyewitness testimony: Civil & Criminal. 5th Ed. 2016 Cumulative Supplement, p 1-26. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law Publishing,\n\n2017\nLoftus, E.F. (2017) Eavesdropping on Memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 1-18.\nVan Damme, I., Kaplan, R.,L., Levine, L.J., & Loftus, E.F. (2017) Emotion and false memory: How goal-irrelevance can be relevant for what people remember. Memory, 25, 201-213. DOI: 10..1080/09658211.2016.1150489.\nBerkowitz, S.F. & Loftus, E.F. (2017). Misinformation in the Courtroom. In H. Otgaar & M.L Howe (Eds) Finding the truth in the courtroom. Oxford Univ Press.\nLacey, C. & Loftus, E.F. (2017) False memories matter. In R. A. Nash & J. Ost (Eds) False and Distorted Memories. NY & London: Routledge, p 143-155\nNash, R.A., Wade, K.A., Garry, M., Loftus, E.F., & Ost, J. (2017) Misrepresentations and flawed logic about the prevalence of false memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 31-33.\nPickrell, J., McDonald, D., Bernstein, D.M., & Loftus, E.F. (2017) Misinformation effect. In R.F. Pohl (Ed) Cognitive Illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment, and memory (2nd ed). Hove, UK: Psychology Press, pp 406-423.\nCrozier, W., Strange, D., & Loftus, E.F. (2017) Memory errors in alibi generation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law.35, 6-17.\nLoftus, E.F. & Greenspan, R.L. (2017) If I'm certain, is it true? Accuracy and Confidence in eyewitness memory. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 1-2\nLoftus, E.F., Dysart, J.E. & Newirth, K.A. (2017) Eyewitness testimony: Civil & Criminal. 5th Ed. 2017 Cumulative Supplement, p 1-31. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law Publishing,\nBogart, D. & Loftus, E. (2017) Eyewitness testimony:A US case study. Psychology Review, Vol 23,7, 2-5\n\n32\nDOJ-OGR-00007540",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 47 of 375",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The rest of the document content",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "32",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007540",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Kaplan, R. L.",
      "Van Damme, I.",
      "Levine, L.J.",
      "Loftus, E.F.",
      "Lacey, C.",
      "Davis, D.",
      "Zhu, B.",
      "Chen. C.",
      "He, Q.",
      "Lei, X.",
      "Dong, Q",
      "Lin, C.",
      "Frenda, S.J.",
      "Berkowitz, S.R.",
      "Fenn, K.M.",
      "Cochran, K.",
      "Greenspan, R.",
      "Bogart, D.",
      "Grady, R.H.",
      "Butler, B.J.",
      "Newman, E. J.",
      "H.L. Miller,Jr.",
      "Doyle, J.M.",
      "Dysart, J.E.",
      "Otgaar, H.",
      "Howe, M.L",
      "Nash, R.A.",
      "Wade, K.A.",
      "Garry, M.",
      "Ost, J.",
      "Pickrell, J.",
      "McDonald, D.",
      "Bernstein, D.M.",
      "Pohl, R.F.",
      "Crozier, W.",
      "Strange, D.",
      "Greenspan, R.L.",
      "Newirth, K.A."
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "National Academy of Sciences",
      "Cambridge University Press",
      "Sage",
      "Lexis Law Publishing",
      "Oxford Univ Press",
      "Routledge",
      "Psychology Press"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "NY",
      "Thousand Oaks, Calif",
      "Charlottesville, VA",
      "NY & London",
      "Hove, UK"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2016",
      "11/23/21",
      "2017"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007540"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of references related to memory and eyewitness testimony. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}