mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008392.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "548",
    "date": "12/15/2021",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 548 Filed 12/15/21 Page 6 of 6\n\nDefense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses' backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness \"from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him\").\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: December 15, 2021\nNew York, New York\n\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 548 Filed 12/15/21 Page 6 of 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Defense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses' backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness \"from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him\").",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dated: December 15, 2021\nNew York, New York",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Alison J. Nathan",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008392",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "December 15, 2021",
      "1968"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 548",
      "390 U.S. 129"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The text is clear and legible, with a handwritten signature present."
}