| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "92",
- "document_number": "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
- "date": "02/24/22",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 92 of 130 A-5777 C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 320 1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the 2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the 3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured 4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was 5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to 6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I 7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay it out. 8 9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the 10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in 11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it 12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into 13 jurors on the internet? 14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government 15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but 16 I know -- 17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if 18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind 19 of resources researching the matter as you were, 20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not 21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about 22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is 23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the 24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but 25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00009381",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 92 of 130",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "A-5777",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 320",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "8 it out.",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "13 jurors on the internet?",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "16 I know --",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "19 of resources researching the matter as you were,",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009381",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "02/24/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
- "1616220",
- "A-5777",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009381"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|