mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010051.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "311",
    "document_number": "A-5768",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2grdau2 Brune - cross 311\n1 A. No.\n2 Q. I ask you the same question. Why not?\n3 A. We spent a lot of time thinking about appellate issues, but\n4 we didn't think that there had been juror misconduct and\n5 therefore didn't think that there was an appellate issue.\n6 Q. At any time between the verdict on May 24th and the receipt\n7 of the letter on June 20th, did your firm contact the Nardello\n8 firm to do additional investigation about Ms. Conrad?\n9 A. No.\n10 Q. Why not?\n11 A. I didn't think there was anything to investigate.\n12 Q. At any time during these proceedings, \"these proceedings\"\n13 meaning between the initial voir dire and today, have you tried\n14 to sandbag this Court or plant error in the record as to Juror\n15 No. 1, Ms. Conrad?\n16 A. No.\n17 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions, Judge.\n18 THE COURT: Redirect, Ms. Davis?\n19 MR. DAVIS: I assume there is no other defense counsel\n20 who wishes to inquire?\n21 THE COURT: Does any defense counsel wish to inquire?\n22 MR. GAIR: No, thank you, your Honor.\n23 MR. ROTERT: No, thank you, Judge.\n24 MS. McCARTHY: No, your Honor.\n25 MR. DAVIS: Just briefly, your Honor.\nMR. DAVIS\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010051",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2grdau2 Brune - cross 311",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. No.\n2 Q. I ask you the same question. Why not?\n3 A. We spent a lot of time thinking about appellate issues, but\n4 we didn't think that there had been juror misconduct and\n5 therefore didn't think that there was an appellate issue.\n6 Q. At any time between the verdict on May 24th and the receipt\n7 of the letter on June 20th, did your firm contact the Nardello\n8 firm to do additional investigation about Ms. Conrad?\n9 A. No.\n10 Q. Why not?\n11 A. I didn't think there was anything to investigate.\n12 Q. At any time during these proceedings, \"these proceedings\"\n13 meaning between the initial voir dire and today, have you tried\n14 to sandbag this Court or plant error in the record as to Juror\n15 No. 1, Ms. Conrad?\n16 A. No.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions, Judge.\n18 THE COURT: Redirect, Ms. Davis?\n19 MR. DAVIS: I assume there is no other defense counsel\n20 who wishes to inquire?\n21 THE COURT: Does any defense counsel wish to inquire?\n22 MR. GAIR: No, thank you, your Honor.\n23 MR. ROTERT: No, thank you, Judge.\n24 MS. McCARTHY: No, your Honor.\n25 MR. DAVIS: Just briefly, your Honor.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. DAVIS\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010051",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune",
      "Ms. Conrad",
      "MR. SHECHTMAN",
      "Ms. Davis",
      "MR. GAIR",
      "MR. ROTERT",
      "MS. McCARTHY",
      "MR. DAVIS"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Nardello firm",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May 24th",
      "June 20th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5768",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010051"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}