DOJ-OGR-00000402.json 4.0 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "16",
  4. "document_number": "18",
  5. "date": "07/16/19",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:18-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 Filed 07/16/19 Page 16 of 18 16\n1 and propose a package. Then the government would like an opportunity to reply to that submission.\n2\n3 The parties would be happy to make those deadlines\n4 Thursday and Saturday respectively. However, we are also happy\n5 to back that up a little bit if the Court prefers not to\n6 receive the government's submission over the weekend. We could\n7 do an earlier deadline on Thursday for defense and a late\n8 Friday deadline for the Court from the government, depending on\n9 what the Court prefers.\n10 THE COURT: I was going to propose defense Thursday at\n11 noon. Is that okay to get your submission in?\n12 MR. WEINBERG: We can do that, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Thanks.\n14 And if you could respond Friday by 5:00 p.m.\n15 MR. ROSSMILLER: We will, your Honor. Thank you.\n16 THE COURT: Then we can have oral presentations. I\n17 take it everybody wants to have oral presentations in addition\n18 to the written. I'll set aside as much time as we need on the\n19 15th at 10:00.\n20 I ask the government if there is a speedy trial issue\n21 or application that takes us to Monday at 10:00 a.m.\n22 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. The government asks\n23 that speedy trial time be excluded until Monday. We do expect\n24 to begin the process of working on producing discovery, to\n25 include discussions with defense counsel about a protective\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000402",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:18-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 Filed 07/16/19 Page 16 of 18 16",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 and propose a package. Then the government would like an opportunity to reply to that submission.\n2\n3 The parties would be happy to make those deadlines\n4 Thursday and Saturday respectively. However, we are also happy\n5 to back that up a little bit if the Court prefers not to\n6 receive the government's submission over the weekend. We could\n7 do an earlier deadline on Thursday for defense and a late\n8 Friday deadline for the Court from the government, depending on\n9 what the Court prefers.\n10 THE COURT: I was going to propose defense Thursday at\n11 noon. Is that okay to get your submission in?\n12 MR. WEINBERG: We can do that, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Thanks.\n14 And if you could respond Friday by 5:00 p.m.\n15 MR. ROSSMILLER: We will, your Honor. Thank you.\n16 THE COURT: Then we can have oral presentations. I\n17 take it everybody wants to have oral presentations in addition\n18 to the written. I'll set aside as much time as we need on the\n19 15th at 10:00.\n20 I ask the government if there is a speedy trial issue\n21 or application that takes us to Monday at 10:00 a.m.\n22 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. The government asks\n23 that speedy trial time be excluded until Monday. We do expect\n24 to begin the process of working on producing discovery, to\n25 include discussions with defense counsel about a protective",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000402",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. WEINBERG",
  36. "MR. ROSSMILLER"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  40. ],
  41. "locations": [],
  42. "dates": [
  43. "07/16/19",
  44. "Monday"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:18-cr-00490-RMB",
  48. "Document 18",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00000402"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }