| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "1 of 9",
- "document_number": "24",
- "date": "07/16/19",
- "document_type": "Letter",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 1 of 9\nLAW OFFICE OF\nMARC FERNICH\nMARC FERNICH maf@fernichlaw.com ALSO ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 212-446-2346 FAX: 212-459-2299 www.fernichlaw.com\nJuly 16, 2019\nBY ECF\nHon. Richard M. Berman USDJ-SDNY 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007\nRe: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY)\nDear Judge Berman:\nIn response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail.\nFirst, make no mistake about the crux of the government's detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its core, the government's position - as urged in its letters and echoed again yesterday - distills to this: the nominally rebuttable remand presumption (connected with 18 USC § 1591 charges)1 plus Epstein's\n1 To be clear, Epstein contends that § 1591 and the concomitant remand presumption do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual\nDOJ-OGR-00000445",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 1 of 9",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LAW OFFICE OF MARC FERNICH",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "MARC FERNICH maf@fernichlaw.com ALSO ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 212-446-2346 FAX: 212-459-2299 www.fernichlaw.com",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "July 16, 2019",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "BY ECF Hon. Richard M. Berman USDJ-SDNY 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mistake about the crux of the government's detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its core, the government's position - as urged in its letters and echoed again yesterday - distills to this: the nominally rebuttable remand presumption (connected with 18 USC § 1591 charges)1 plus Epstein's",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 To be clear, Epstein contends that § 1591 and the concomitant remand presumption do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000445",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MARC FERNICH",
- "Richard M. Berman",
- "Jeffrey Epstein"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "LAW OFFICE OF MARC FERNICH"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York",
- "Massachusetts"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "July 16, 2019"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
- "Document 24",
- "19 CR 490",
- "DOJ-OGR-00000445"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a letter from Marc Fernich to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case US v. Epstein. The letter is dated July 16, 2019, and is related to a request for bail. The document is printed and contains no handwritten text or stamps."
- }
|