mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000613.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "42",
    "date": "08/06/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42 Filed 08/06/19 Page 2 of 10 2 j7v2espC kjc 1 THE COURT: So, today's conference was scheduled at the end of the July 18 court conference hearing on that date. 2 I thought that we would devote at least the -- well, probably most of today's proceeding to talking about the schedule in 3 this case, and I asked the lawyers to get together and see if 4 they could come up with a mutually agreeable schedule, which 5 would include trial date, motion practice, discovery, etc. 6 7 Does anybody want to let me know how you made out? 8 9 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 10 We have conferred with defense counsel and talked 11 about a proposed schedule for this case. So we are prepared to 12 propose to the court today a schedule for discovery, for 13 discovery-related motions, for pretrial motions, and we are 14 also prepared to talk about setting a possible trial date. 15 THE COURT: Okay. What have you got in mind? 16 MS. MOE: So, with respect to discovery, we would 17 propose a discovery deadline of October 31 to complete 18 discovery, with one exception. There are materials from 19 devices seized from the defendant's residence in New York, and 20 the F.B.I. is beginning the process of reviewing that data. 21 In discussing that with defense counsel, we have begun 22 to discuss a process for a privilege-review protocol. It's 23 possible that process may take longer than October 31. But 24 aside from that universe of documents, we would propose setting 25 a schedule of October 31 as a deadline for discovery. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00000613",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42 Filed 08/06/19 Page 2 of 10 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "j7v2espC kjc",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: So, today's conference was scheduled at the end of the July 18 court conference hearing on that date. 2 I thought that we would devote at least the -- well, probably most of today's proceeding to talking about the schedule in 3 this case, and I asked the lawyers to get together and see if 4 they could come up with a mutually agreeable schedule, which 5 would include trial date, motion practice, discovery, etc. 6 7 Does anybody want to let me know how you made out? 8 9 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 10 We have conferred with defense counsel and talked 11 about a proposed schedule for this case. So we are prepared to 12 propose to the court today a schedule for discovery, for 13 discovery-related motions, for pretrial motions, and we are 14 also prepared to talk about setting a possible trial date. 15 THE COURT: Okay. What have you got in mind? 16 MS. MOE: So, with respect to discovery, we would 17 propose a discovery deadline of October 31 to complete 18 discovery, with one exception. There are materials from 19 devices seized from the defendant's residence in New York, and 20 the F.B.I. is beginning the process of reviewing that data. 21 In discussing that with defense counsel, we have begun 22 to discuss a process for a privilege-review protocol. It's 23 possible that process may take longer than October 31. But 24 aside from that universe of documents, we would propose setting 25 a schedule of October 31 as a deadline for discovery.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000613",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "F.B.I.",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "July 18",
      "October 31",
      "08/06/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 42",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000613"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}