DOJ-OGR-00001042.json 3.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "101",
  4. "document_number": "20-2",
  5. "date": "04/01/2021",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page101 of 200\nthat you have a written statement and then that there is an alleged victim who wishes to be heard. Is that correct?\nMS. MOE: That is correct, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Why don't you begin with the written statement and then after that you can identify, as you like, the alleged victim who wishes to be heard, and my staff will unmute at that time that person so that they can be heard.\nGo ahead.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\nAs I mentioned before, your Honor, the government has received a written statement from a victim who prefers to be referred to as Jane Doe today in order to protect her privacy.\nThe following are the words of Jane Doe which I will read from her written statement.\nJane Doe wrote:\n\"I knew Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. It was her calculating and sadistic manipulation that anesthetized me, in order to deliver me, with full knowledge of the heinous and dehumanizing abuse that awaited me, straight to the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Without Ghislaine, Jeffrey could not have done what he did. She was in charge. She egged him on and encouraged him. She told me of others she recruited and she thought it was funny. She pretends to care only to garner sympathy, and enjoys drawing her victims in with perceived caring, only to entrap them and make them feel some sense of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001042",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page101 of 200",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "that you have a written statement and then that there is an alleged victim who wishes to be heard. Is that correct?\nMS. MOE: That is correct, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Why don't you begin with the written statement and then after that you can identify, as you like, the alleged victim who wishes to be heard, and my staff will unmute at that time that person so that they can be heard.\nGo ahead.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\nAs I mentioned before, your Honor, the government has received a written statement from a victim who prefers to be referred to as Jane Doe today in order to protect her privacy.\nThe following are the words of Jane Doe which I will read from her written statement.\nJane Doe wrote:\n\"I knew Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. It was her calculating and sadistic manipulation that anesthetized me, in order to deliver me, with full knowledge of the heinous and dehumanizing abuse that awaited me, straight to the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Without Ghislaine, Jeffrey could not have done what he did. She was in charge. She egged him on and encouraged him. She told me of others she recruited and she thought it was funny. She pretends to care only to garner sympathy, and enjoys drawing her victims in with perceived caring, only to entrap them and make them feel some sense of",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001042",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  36. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  37. "Jane Doe",
  38. "MS. MOE"
  39. ],
  40. "organizations": [
  41. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [],
  44. "dates": [
  45. "04/01/2021"
  46. ],
  47. "reference_numbers": [
  48. "Case 21-770",
  49. "Document 20-2",
  50. "3068530",
  51. "DOJ-OGR-00001042"
  52. ]
  53. },
  54. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  55. }