mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001714.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "30",
    "date": "August 10, 2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 30 Filed 08/10/20 Page 2 of 6\n\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nAugust 10, 2020\nPage 2\n\nthat we can mount an effective defense investigation and adequately prepare for trial. This is especially true in this case where the alleged misconduct took place on unspecified dates roughly 25 years ago in multiple locations—namely, New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the United Kingdom—and where the central figure, Jeffrey Epstein, is alleged to have engaged in misconduct with dozens, if not hundreds, of alleged victims. The defense should not have to speculate which of these individuals are Victims 1-3 referenced in the indictment.\n\nIt is now almost six weeks since Ms. Maxwell's arrest, and the government is just now beginning to produce Rule 16 discovery, despite confirming to the Court that discovery would begin as soon as the Court entered a protective order. Moreover, the government still has not confirmed to the defense the identities of Victims 1-3. Ms. Maxwell was arrested on July 2, 2020. On July 14, 2020, during her arraignment and bail hearing, the government indicated that it had \"begun preparing an initial production\" and would be \"prepared to produce a first batch of discovery as soon as a protective order [was] entered by the Court.\"1 The Court entered the protective order on July 30, 2020. (Dkt. 36). The following day, July 31, 2020, defense counsel contacted the government and requested disclosure of the identities of Victims 1-3. The government refused to do so, stating that it would only disclose the identities of alleged victims through its production of Rule 16 discovery, or as part of its production of Jencks Act material closer to trial. That same day, per the government's request, the defense provided a hard drive to load the Rule 16 discovery. However, the government did not make its first production until after 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 5, 2020.\n\nThe government's initial production was a subset of non-electronic discovery materials, totaling nearly 13,000 pages, which the defense expeditiously reviewed for high-level content. Upon initial review, the materials contain certain records related to one specific individual. However, nothing in the production specifically identifies this individual as Victim 1, 2, or 3. The defense should not be required to speculate whether this individual is one of the three alleged Victims, and if so, which one. Moreover, the initial production does not appear to contain any materials identifying the other two alleged Victims. Although the government has indicated that it will provide additional discovery on a rolling basis, if the initial production is any guide, it seems unlikely that later productions will sufficiently identify the remaining alleged Victims. Furthermore, the defense should not be forced to wait almost two additional weeks until August 21, 2020 (the deadline for the production of initial non-electronic discovery) or potentially months until November 9, 2020 (deadline for the completion of all discovery) before learning information that is vital to the defense. Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial depends on the defense's ability to adequately investigate the charges against her, and that investigation will be significantly impaired until we know for certain the names of Victims 1-3.\n\n1 July 14, 2020 Tr. at 12:14-17; see also id. at 12:25-13:3 (\"Following the entry of [the] protective order . . . the government is prepared to make a substantial production of discovery.\")\n\nDOJ-OGR-00001714",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 30 Filed 08/10/20 Page 2 of 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nAugust 10, 2020\nPage 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "that we can mount an effective defense investigation and adequately prepare for trial. This is especially true in this case where the alleged misconduct took place on unspecified dates roughly 25 years ago in multiple locations—namely, New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the United Kingdom—and where the central figure, Jeffrey Epstein, is alleged to have engaged in misconduct with dozens, if not hundreds, of alleged victims. The defense should not have to speculate which of these individuals are Victims 1-3 referenced in the indictment.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "It is now almost six weeks since Ms. Maxwell's arrest, and the government is just now beginning to produce Rule 16 discovery, despite confirming to the Court that discovery would begin as soon as the Court entered a protective order. Moreover, the government still has not confirmed to the defense the identities of Victims 1-3. Ms. Maxwell was arrested on July 2, 2020. On July 14, 2020, during her arraignment and bail hearing, the government indicated that it had \"begun preparing an initial production\" and would be \"prepared to produce a first batch of discovery as soon as a protective order [was] entered by the Court.\"1 The Court entered the protective order on July 30, 2020. (Dkt. 36). The following day, July 31, 2020, defense counsel contacted the government and requested disclosure of the identities of Victims 1-3. The government refused to do so, stating that it would only disclose the identities of alleged victims through its production of Rule 16 discovery, or as part of its production of Jencks Act material closer to trial. That same day, per the government's request, the defense provided a hard drive to load the Rule 16 discovery. However, the government did not make its first production until after 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 5, 2020.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The government's initial production was a subset of non-electronic discovery materials, totaling nearly 13,000 pages, which the defense expeditiously reviewed for high-level content. Upon initial review, the materials contain certain records related to one specific individual. However, nothing in the production specifically identifies this individual as Victim 1, 2, or 3. The defense should not be required to speculate whether this individual is one of the three alleged Victims, and if so, which one. Moreover, the initial production does not appear to contain any materials identifying the other two alleged Victims. Although the government has indicated that it will provide additional discovery on a rolling basis, if the initial production is any guide, it seems unlikely that later productions will sufficiently identify the remaining alleged Victims. Furthermore, the defense should not be forced to wait almost two additional weeks until August 21, 2020 (the deadline for the production of initial non-electronic discovery) or potentially months until November 9, 2020 (deadline for the completion of all discovery) before learning information that is vital to the defense. Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial depends on the defense's ability to adequately investigate the charges against her, and that investigation will be significantly impaired until we know for certain the names of Victims 1-3.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 July 14, 2020 Tr. at 12:14-17; see also id. at 12:25-13:3 (\"Following the entry of [the] protective order . . . the government is prepared to make a substantial production of discovery.\")",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001714",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Court",
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Florida",
      "New Mexico",
      "United Kingdom"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "August 10, 2020",
      "July 2, 2020",
      "July 14, 2020",
      "July 30, 2020",
      "July 31, 2020",
      "August 5, 2020",
      "August 21, 2020",
      "November 9, 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 30",
      "Dkt. 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001714"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, discussing the government's production of discovery materials and the defense's concerns regarding the identification of alleged victims."
}