mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002483.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 17 of 33\n1 280-2. These are Palm Beach County State Attorney's\n2 Office public records. Unseal in the same manner as the Second\n3 Circuit allowed the unsealing.\n4 288. Letter motion regarding discovery. Not sealed.\n5 288-1. E-mail correspondence. Not sealed.\n6 288-2. More e-mail correspondence. Not sealed.\n7 289. Letter motion in response to the motion to seal.\n8 Not sealed.\n9 290. Letter response in opposition to the motion.\n10 Redact identifying information and e-mail addresses.\n11 291. Declaration of Ms. Schultz. Not sealed.\n12 291-1. E-mail correspondence from Ms. Menninger. The\n13 parties agree unsealed. I think it was not sealed.\n14 291-2. Letter correspondence from Ms. Schultz.\n15 Unseal in full except for paragraph 1 under document request\n16 No. 1. Should remain sealed.\n17 291-3. Letter correspondence from Ms. Schultz.\n18 Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of\n19 nonparties.\n20 300. Letter to Judge Sweet. Not sealed.\n21 300-1:2. E-mail correspondence. Not sealed.\n22 337. Letter motion. Not sealed.\n23 338. Memorandum of law in support of the adverse\n24 inference motion. Redact names and identifying information of\n25 nonparties and excerpts from their testimony. Redact e-mail\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00002483",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 17 of 33",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 280-2. These are Palm Beach County State Attorney's\n2 Office public records. Unseal in the same manner as the Second\n3 Circuit allowed the unsealing.\n4 288. Letter motion regarding discovery. Not sealed.\n5 288-1. E-mail correspondence. Not sealed.\n6 288-2. More e-mail correspondence. Not sealed.\n7 289. Letter motion in response to the motion to seal.\n8 Not sealed.\n9 290. Letter response in opposition to the motion.\n10 Redact identifying information and e-mail addresses.\n11 291. Declaration of Ms. Schultz. Not sealed.\n12 291-1. E-mail correspondence from Ms. Menninger. The\n13 parties agree unsealed. I think it was not sealed.\n14 291-2. Letter correspondence from Ms. Schultz.\n15 Unseal in full except for paragraph 1 under document request\n16 No. 1. Should remain sealed.\n17 291-3. Letter correspondence from Ms. Schultz.\n18 Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of\n19 nonparties.\n20 300. Letter to Judge Sweet. Not sealed.\n21 300-1:2. E-mail correspondence. Not sealed.\n22 337. Letter motion. Not sealed.\n23 338. Memorandum of law in support of the adverse\n24 inference motion. Redact names and identifying information of\n25 nonparties and excerpts from their testimony. Redact e-mail",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002483",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Schultz",
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Judge Sweet"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Palm Beach County"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "136-9",
      "280-2",
      "288",
      "288-1",
      "288-2",
      "289",
      "290",
      "291",
      "291-1",
      "291-2",
      "291-3",
      "300",
      "300-1:2",
      "337",
      "338",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002483"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of documents and their sealing status. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}