DOJ-OGR-00002499.json 3.3 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "33",
  4. "document_number": "136-9",
  5. "date": "02/04/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 33 of 33 32\n1\nFirst, there is a difference between people like\n2\nProfessor Dershowitz, who say affirmatively, I don't care, let\n3\nit all out, and people from whom we just have not heard,\n4\nwhether they received the documents or not.\n5\nSecondly, I understand that my direction from the\n6\nCourt of Appeals is to make a particularized finding. I don't\n7\nthink I can weigh the countervailing interests of any\n8\nparticular Doe without considering that particular Doe by\n9\nhimself or herself.\n10\nAccordingly, I don't think we can lump them together.\n11\nShould we receive indications from other Does that they\n12\naffirmatively have no objection to release of their material,\n13\nthat makes it easy. But, otherwise, we have to go through\n14\nthem, and I have to make a particularized finding. It will be\n15\na long, tedious process, but even this time I think it went a\n16\nlittle more quickly.\n17\nAnything else, counsel?\n18\nThank you, counsel, and thank you again for your\n19\nassistance in organizing the documents. Good morning.\n20\n(Adjourned)\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00002499",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 33 of 33 32",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "First, there is a difference between people like\nProfessor Dershowitz, who say affirmatively, I don't care, let\nit all out, and people from whom we just have not heard,\nwhether they received the documents or not.\n\nSecondly, I understand that my direction from the\nCourt of Appeals is to make a particularized finding. I don't\nthink I can weigh the countervailing interests of any\nparticular Doe without considering that particular Doe by\nhimself or herself.\n\nAccordingly, I don't think we can lump them together.\nShould we receive indications from other Does that they\naffirmatively have no objection to release of their material,\nthat makes it easy. But, otherwise, we have to go through\nthem, and I have to make a particularized finding. It will be\na long, tedious process, but even this time I think it went a\nlittle more quickly.\n\nAnything else, counsel?\n\nThank you, counsel, and thank you again for your\nassistance in organizing the documents. Good morning.\n(Adjourned)",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002499",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Dershowitz"
  36. ],
  37. "organizations": [
  38. "Court of Appeals",
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  40. ],
  41. "locations": [],
  42. "dates": [
  43. "02/04/21"
  44. ],
  45. "reference_numbers": [
  46. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  47. "136-9",
  48. "DOJ-OGR-00002499"
  49. ]
  50. },
  51. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  52. }