mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002779.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "170",
    "date": "03/22/21",
    "document_type": "Letter",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 170 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 22, 2021 BY ECF & ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In accordance with the Court's March 18, 2021 order (the \"Order\"), the parties have met and conferred regarding proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter dated March 9, 2021. The parties have reached agreement regarding redactions as to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The parties do not believe any redactions are needed as to the defendant's cover letter. The parties' proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 are submitted under seal for the Court's consideration. The Government intends to file its omnibus memorandum of law and the corresponding exhibits consistent with the Court's Order, with one exception to which the defense consents. In particular, the defense has indicated that it no longer wishes the Government to remove the redactions the Government had originally proposed to pages 118 to 119 of the Government's brief. Those redactions refer to and quote from portions of an exhibit filed under seal by the defense and which the Government understands is filed under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP). Accordingly, the Government has kept those redactions in the attached omnibus memorandum of law. Additionally, and mindful of the presumption of public access, the Government notes that some of the defense's proposed redactions which the Court adopted in the Order include language DOJ-OGR-00002779",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 170 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 22, 2021",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "BY ECF & ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan:",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In accordance with the Court's March 18, 2021 order (the \"Order\"), the parties have met and conferred regarding proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter dated March 9, 2021. The parties have reached agreement regarding redactions as to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The parties do not believe any redactions are needed as to the defendant's cover letter. The parties' proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 are submitted under seal for the Court's consideration.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Government intends to file its omnibus memorandum of law and the corresponding exhibits consistent with the Court's Order, with one exception to which the defense consents. In particular, the defense has indicated that it no longer wishes the Government to remove the redactions the Government had originally proposed to pages 118 to 119 of the Government's brief. Those redactions refer to and quote from portions of an exhibit filed under seal by the defense and which the Government understands is filed under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP). Accordingly, the Government has kept those redactions in the attached omnibus memorandum of law. Additionally, and mindful of the presumption of public access, the Government notes that some of the defense's proposed redactions which the Court adopted in the Order include language",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002779",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "U.S. Department of Justice",
      "United States Attorney",
      "United States District Court",
      "United States Courthouse"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "March 22, 2021",
      "March 18, 2021",
      "March 9, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "15 Civ. 7433 (LAP)",
      "170",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002779"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the Honorable Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter discusses proposed redactions to certain documents and the government's intention to file an omnibus memorandum of law. The document is typed and does not contain any handwritten text or stamps."
}