mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00002942.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "204",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 239\n\nHemphill v. United States,\n392 F.2d 45 (8th Cir. 1968)...................................................................................................................................... 268\nHerring v. United States,\n555 U.S. 135 (2009) ................................................................................................................................................ 123\nHowell v. Superintendent Rockview SCI,\n939 F.3d 260 (2d Cir. 2019) ...................................................................................................................................... 302\nHuddleston v. United States,\n485 U.S. 681 (1988) ................................................................................................................................................ 254\nIn re Enter. Mort. Acceptance Co. Sec. Litig. (\"Enterprise\"),\n391 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2004) .............................................................................................................................. 36, 43, 44\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Apr. 19, 1991,\n945 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1991) ................................................................................................................................ 108, 113\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992,\n1 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1993) ........................................................................................................................................ 140, 145\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena,\n826 F.2d 1166 (1987) .............................................................................................................................................. 136\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena,\n836 F.2d 1468 (4th Cir. 1988) ................................................................................................................................ 149\nIn re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 29, 1999,\n191 F.3d 173 (2d Cir. 1999) ................................................................................................................................ 139\nIn Re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Jan. 5, 1988,\n847 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir. 1988) ................................................................................................................................ 136\nIn re U.S.,\n834 F.2d 283 (2d Cir. 1987) ...................................................................................................................................... 284\nIn re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas,\n924 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App'x 37 (2d Cir. 2014) .................................................... 140\nInt'l Equity Invs., Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd.,\nNo. 05 Civ. 2745 (JGK) (RLE), 2010 WL 779314 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2010) ............................................................ 111\nJohnson v. United States,\n520 U.S. 461 (1997) ................................................................................................................................................ 200\nKungys v. United States,\n485 U.S. 759 (1988) ................................................................................................................................................ 222\nLandgraf v. USI Film Products,\n511 U.S. 244 (1994) .............................................................................................................................................. 35, 36, 41, 42\nLeocal v. Ashcroft,\n543 U.S. 1 (2004) ...................................................................................................................................................... 56, 57\nMadanes v. Madanes,\n186 F.R.D. 279 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) ............................................................................................................................ 141\nMartindell v. Int'l Tel. and Tel. Corp.,\n594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) ................................................................................................................................ passim\nMartinez v. McAleenan,\n385 F. Supp. 3d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) .................................................................................................................... 150, 151\nMichigan v. Tucker,\n417 U.S. 433 (1974) ................................................................................................................................................ 137\n\niii\n\nDOJ-OGR-00002942",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 239",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Hemphill v. United States,\n392 F.2d 45 (8th Cir. 1968)...................................................................................................................................... 268\nHerring v. United States,\n555 U.S. 135 (2009) ................................................................................................................................................ 123\nHowell v. Superintendent Rockview SCI,\n939 F.3d 260 (2d Cir. 2019) ...................................................................................................................................... 302\nHuddleston v. United States,\n485 U.S. 681 (1988) ................................................................................................................................................ 254\nIn re Enter. Mort. Acceptance Co. Sec. Litig. (\"Enterprise\"),\n391 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2004) .............................................................................................................................. 36, 43, 44\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Apr. 19, 1991,\n945 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1991) ................................................................................................................................ 108, 113\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992,\n1 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1993) ........................................................................................................................................ 140, 145\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena,\n826 F.2d 1166 (1987) .............................................................................................................................................. 136\nIn re Grand Jury Subpoena,\n836 F.2d 1468 (4th Cir. 1988) ................................................................................................................................ 149\nIn re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 29, 1999,\n191 F.3d 173 (2d Cir. 1999) ................................................................................................................................ 139\nIn Re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Jan. 5, 1988,\n847 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir. 1988) ................................................................................................................................ 136\nIn re U.S.,\n834 F.2d 283 (2d Cir. 1987) ...................................................................................................................................... 284\nIn re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas,\n924 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App'x 37 (2d Cir. 2014) .................................................... 140\nInt'l Equity Invs., Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd.,\nNo. 05 Civ. 2745 (JGK) (RLE), 2010 WL 779314 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2010) ............................................................ 111\nJohnson v. United States,\n520 U.S. 461 (1997) ................................................................................................................................................ 200\nKungys v. United States,\n485 U.S. 759 (1988) ................................................................................................................................................ 222\nLandgraf v. USI Film Products,\n511 U.S. 244 (1994) .............................................................................................................................................. 35, 36, 41, 42\nLeocal v. Ashcroft,\n543 U.S. 1 (2004) ...................................................................................................................................................... 56, 57\nMadanes v. Madanes,\n186 F.R.D. 279 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) ............................................................................................................................ 141\nMartindell v. Int'l Tel. and Tel. Corp.,\n594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) ................................................................................................................................ passim\nMartinez v. McAleenan,\n385 F. Supp. 3d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) .................................................................................................................... 150, 151\nMichigan v. Tucker,\n417 U.S. 433 (1974) ................................................................................................................................................ 137",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "iii",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002942",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Hemphill",
      "Herring",
      "Howell",
      "Huddleston",
      "Johnson",
      "Kungys",
      "Landgraf",
      "Leocal",
      "Madanes",
      "Martindell",
      "Martinez",
      "Tucker",
      "Ashcroft",
      "McAleenan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States",
      "Rockview SCI",
      "Enterprise",
      "USI Film Products",
      "Int'l Tel. and Tel. Corp.",
      "Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "S.D.N.Y.",
      "2d Cir.",
      "8th Cir.",
      "4th Cir."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "1968",
      "2009",
      "2019",
      "1988",
      "2004",
      "1991",
      "1993",
      "1987",
      "1999",
      "2013",
      "2014",
      "2010",
      "1997",
      "1994",
      "1979",
      "1974"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 204",
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "No. 05 Civ. 2745 (JGK) (RLE)"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of case references. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}