mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003183.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "204-3",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 7 of 348\n\nSecretary of Labor. In a brief oral statement, Acosta explained that continued media attention on his handling of the Epstein investigation rather than on the economy was unfair to the Labor Department.\n\nOn August 10, 2019, Epstein was found hanging in his cell and was later pronounced dead. The New York City Chief Medical Examiner concluded that Epstein had committed suicide.\n\nAs a result of Epstein's death, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York filed a nolle prosequi to dismiss the pending indictment against Epstein. On August 27, 2019, the district court held a hearing at which more than a dozen of Epstein's victims-including victims of the conduct in Florida that was addressed through the NPA-spoke about the impact of Epstein's crimes. The court dismissed the Epstein indictment on August 29, 2019.\n\nAfter Epstein's death, the federal district court in Florida overseeing the CVRA litigation denied the petitioners their requested remedies and closed the case as moot. Among its findings, the court concluded that although the government had violated the CVRA, the government had asserted \"legitimate and legally supportable positions throughout this litigation,\" and therefore had not litigated in bad faith. The court also noted it expected the government to \"honor its representation that it will provide training to its employees about the CVRA and the proper treatment of crime victims,\" as well as honoring its promise to meet with the victims.\n\nOn September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner \"Jane Doe 1\" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that \"as a matter of law, the legal obligations under the CVRA do not attach prior to the government charging a case\" and thus, \"the CVRA was not triggered in [the Southern District of Florida] because no criminal charges were brought.\" Nevertheless, during oral argument, the government conceded that the USAO had not been \"fully transparent\" with the petitioner and had \"made a mistake in causing her to believe that the case was ongoing when in fact the NPA had been signed.\" On April 14, 2020, a divided panel of the Court of Appeals denied the petition, ruling that CVRA rights do not attach until a defendant has been criminally charged. On August 7, 2020, the court granted the petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the panel's opinion; as of the date of this Report, a briefing schedule has been issued, and oral argument is set for December 3, 2020.\n\nII. THE INITIATION AND SCOPE OF OPR'S INVESTIGATION\n\nAfter the Miami Herald published its investigative report on November 28, 2018, U.S. Senator Ben Sasse, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, sent a December 3, 2018 letter to OPR, citing the Miami Herald's report and requesting that OPR \"open an investigation into the instances identified in this reporting of possible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys.\" On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened\n\nV\n\nDOJ-OGR-00003183",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 7 of 348",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Secretary of Labor. In a brief oral statement, Acosta explained that continued media attention on his handling of the Epstein investigation rather than on the economy was unfair to the Labor Department.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On August 10, 2019, Epstein was found hanging in his cell and was later pronounced dead. The New York City Chief Medical Examiner concluded that Epstein had committed suicide.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "As a result of Epstein's death, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York filed a nolle prosequi to dismiss the pending indictment against Epstein. On August 27, 2019, the district court held a hearing at which more than a dozen of Epstein's victims-including victims of the conduct in Florida that was addressed through the NPA-spoke about the impact of Epstein's crimes. The court dismissed the Epstein indictment on August 29, 2019.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "After Epstein's death, the federal district court in Florida overseeing the CVRA litigation denied the petitioners their requested remedies and closed the case as moot. Among its findings, the court concluded that although the government had violated the CVRA, the government had asserted \"legitimate and legally supportable positions throughout this litigation,\" and therefore had not litigated in bad faith. The court also noted it expected the government to \"honor its representation that it will provide training to its employees about the CVRA and the proper treatment of crime victims,\" as well as honoring its promise to meet with the victims.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner \"Jane Doe 1\" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that \"as a matter of law, the legal obligations under the CVRA do not attach prior to the government charging a case\" and thus, \"the CVRA was not triggered in [the Southern District of Florida] because no criminal charges were brought.\" Nevertheless, during oral argument, the government conceded that the USAO had not been \"fully transparent\" with the petitioner and had \"made a mistake in causing her to believe that the case was ongoing when in fact the NPA had been signed.\" On April 14, 2020, a divided panel of the Court of Appeals denied the petition, ruling that CVRA rights do not attach until a defendant has been criminally charged. On August 7, 2020, the court granted the petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the panel's opinion; as of the date of this Report, a briefing schedule has been issued, and oral argument is set for December 3, 2020.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. THE INITIATION AND SCOPE OF OPR'S INVESTIGATION",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "After the Miami Herald published its investigative report on November 28, 2018, U.S. Senator Ben Sasse, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, sent a December 3, 2018 letter to OPR, citing the Miami Herald's report and requesting that OPR \"open an investigation into the instances identified in this reporting of possible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys.\" On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "V",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003183",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Acosta",
      "Epstein",
      "Jane Doe 1",
      "Ben Sasse"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Labor Department",
      "U.S. Attorney's Office",
      "New York City Chief Medical Examiner",
      "Department of Justice",
      "Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts",
      "Miami Herald",
      "Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR)",
      "Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Florida",
      "Southern District of New York",
      "Southern District of Florida",
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "August 10, 2019",
      "August 27, 2019",
      "August 29, 2019",
      "September 30, 2019",
      "April 14, 2020",
      "August 7, 2020",
      "December 3, 2020",
      "November 28, 2018",
      "December 3, 2018",
      "February 6, 2019",
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "204-3",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003183"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, discussing the handling of the case by the Department of Justice and the impact of Epstein's death on related litigation. The text is printed and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
}