mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003592.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "251",
    "document_number": "1204-10",
    "date": "10/22/2021",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-00233-JPAE Document 1204-10 Filed 10/22/21 Page 251 of 455\nG Maxwell - Confidential\nPage 251\n1 Q. Were there any 16 year year old masseuse that you are aware of?\n2 A. I am not aware.\n3 Q. Any 15?\n4 A. I just want to be clear. The only person that I am aware of who claims to have been a -- we have to -- we established Virginia now is 17, given she has changed her age so many times. The only person that I am aware of that was a masseuse at the time when I was present in the house was Virginia.\n5 Q. Is it an obvious lie that Jeffrey Epstein had a sexual preference for underage minors?\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n7 A. Can you ask the question again?\n8 Q. It is it an obvious lie that Jeffrey Epstein had a sexual preference for underage minors?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n10 A. Can you ask the question again?\n11 Q. Is it an obvious lie that Jeffrey\nMAGNA LEGAL SERVICES\nDOJ-OGR-00003592",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-00233-JPAE Document 1204-10 Filed 10/22/21 Page 251 of 455",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "G Maxwell - Confidential",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page 251",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. Were there any 16 year year old masseuse that you are aware of?\n2 A. I am not aware.\n3 Q. Any 15?\n4 A. I just want to be clear. The only person that I am aware of who claims to have been a -- we have to -- we established Virginia now is 17, given she has changed her age so many times. The only person that I am aware of that was a masseuse at the time when I was present in the house was Virginia.\n5 Q. Is it an obvious lie that Jeffrey Epstein had a sexual preference for underage minors?\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n7 A. Can you ask the question again?\n8 Q. It is it an obvious lie that Jeffrey Epstein had a sexual preference for underage minors?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n10 A. Can you ask the question again?\n11 Q. Is it an obvious lie that Jeffrey",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003592",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "G Maxwell",
      "Virginia",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/22/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-00233-JPAE",
      "1204-10",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003592"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}