DOJ-OGR-00003609.json 3.0 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "85",
  4. "document_number": "204-11",
  5. "date": "04/16/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-11 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 21\nConfidential\nPage 85\nG. Maxwell - Confidential\nonly area that the witness was precluded\nfrom talking about in the first\ndeposition. So that's where we're at.\nMR. BOIES: I think that directly\nmisreads the judge's order, including\nwhere it says: Defendant is ordered to\nanswer questions relating to defendant's\nown sexual activity with or involving\nJeffrey Epstein, with or involving\nplaintiff, with or involving underage\nfemales, involving or including massage\nwith individuals defendant knew to be or\nbelieved might become known to Epstein.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: All of it is\npreceded by the word sexual activity.\nMR. BOIES: I think your point of\nview is an interesting one, but we will\nsee what the judge rules on it.\nBY MR. BOIES:\nMAGNA\nLEGAL SERVICES\nDOJ-OGR-00003609",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-11 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 21",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Confidential",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Page 85\nG. Maxwell - Confidential\nonly area that the witness was precluded\nfrom talking about in the first\ndeposition. So that's where we're at.\nMR. BOIES: I think that directly\nmisreads the judge's order, including\nwhere it says: Defendant is ordered to\nanswer questions relating to defendant's\nown sexual activity with or involving\nJeffrey Epstein, with or involving\nplaintiff, with or involving underage\nfemales, involving or including massage\nwith individuals defendant knew to be or\nbelieved might become known to Epstein.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: All of it is\npreceded by the word sexual activity.\nMR. BOIES: I think your point of\nview is an interesting one, but we will\nsee what the judge rules on it.\nBY MR. BOIES:",
  25. "position": "main content"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "other",
  29. "content": "■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■",
  30. "position": "main content"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "MAGNA\nLEGAL SERVICES",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003609",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [
  45. "G. Maxwell",
  46. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  47. "MR. BOIES",
  48. "MR. PAGLIUCA"
  49. ],
  50. "organizations": [
  51. "MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES"
  52. ],
  53. "locations": [],
  54. "dates": [
  55. "04/16/21"
  56. ],
  57. "reference_numbers": [
  58. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  59. "204-11",
  60. "DOJ-OGR-00003609"
  61. ]
  62. },
  63. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some redacted information. The redacted text is represented by black bars."
  64. }