mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003825.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "212-2",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 23 of 30\nApp.-0826\nG4LMGIUC 22\n1 With respect to the interrogatories, your Honor ruled\n2 on this previously, but there is a local Rule 33.3, which is\n3 why we didn't serve interrogatories in this case at this point.\n4 She is deposing the plaintiff in two weeks, next week, whenever\n5 it is, and can certainly ask those questions as well. But we\n6 have disclosed the names of the providers.\n7 MS. MENNINGER: They have not, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Look. Wait just a moment. You two are\n9 lawyers. Now, that is not an issue about which you should\n10 differ. Go over in the corner right now, both of you, and\n11 let's make it clear who is telling me the right story. Now.\n12 I take it that I misunderstood the colloquy and that\n13 this matter has been resolved.\n14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a\n15 misunderstanding with respect --\n16 THE COURT: I was sure.\n17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for\n18 deposition in Colorado already. In my view, we have disclosed\n19 the doctors. Ms. Menninger says that there is other doctors\n20 that have been disclosed in documents that we have not yet\n21 listed to her. I think in discovery we are finding\n22 additional --\n23 THE COURT: You think you may not have discovered that\n24 your client has had some doctors --\n25 MS. McCAWLEY: In the past. We are talking about\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00003825",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 23 of 30",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "App.-0826",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "G4LMGIUC 22",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 With respect to the interrogatories, your Honor ruled\n2 on this previously, but there is a local Rule 33.3, which is\n3 why we didn't serve interrogatories in this case at this point.\n4 She is deposing the plaintiff in two weeks, next week, whenever\n5 it is, and can certainly ask those questions as well. But we\n6 have disclosed the names of the providers.\n7 MS. MENNINGER: They have not, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Look. Wait just a moment. You two are\n9 lawyers. Now, that is not an issue about which you should\n10 differ. Go over in the corner right now, both of you, and\n11 let's make it clear who is telling me the right story. Now.\n12 I take it that I misunderstood the colloquy and that\n13 this matter has been resolved.\n14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a\n15 misunderstanding with respect --\n16 THE COURT: I was sure.\n17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for\n18 deposition in Colorado already. In my view, we have disclosed\n19 the doctors. Ms. Menninger says that there is other doctors\n20 that have been disclosed in documents that we have not yet\n21 listed to her. I think in discovery we are finding\n22 additional --\n23 THE COURT: You think you may not have discovered that\n24 your client has had some doctors --\n25 MS. McCAWLEY: In the past. We are talking about",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003825",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. McCAWLEY",
      "Dr. Olsen"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Colorado"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "212-2",
      "App.-0826",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003825"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}