DOJ-OGR-00003912.json 3.4 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "15",
  4. "document_number": "224",
  5. "date": "04/20/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 224 Filed 04/20/21 Page 15 of 17 one or more of Ms. Maxwell's lawyers should become actual witnesses, a circumstance that would create a circus, not a fair trial. The truth of the matter is simple: the government included the Perjury Counts because it wants to call Ms. Maxwell a liar in front of the jury and because it wanted a way to introduce unrelated, but extremely prejudicial evidence of alleged sexual abuse through the back door. The simple, non-prejudicial, solution is to sever the Perjury Counts.7 CONCLUSION The Perjury Counts are improperly joined with the Mann Act Counts. A joint trial of these charges would deny Ms. Maxwell her right to a fair trial and her counsel. Accordingly, the Court should grant the request for a separate trial on the Perjury Counts. Dated: March 15, 2021 Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca 7 Ms. Maxwell's Colorado Counsel would not participate as advocates in any trial of those charges but would testify as witnesses. 11 DOJ-OGR-00003912",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 224 Filed 04/20/21 Page 15 of 17",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "one or more of Ms. Maxwell's lawyers should become actual witnesses, a circumstance that would create a circus, not a fair trial. The truth of the matter is simple: the government included the Perjury Counts because it wants to call Ms. Maxwell a liar in front of the jury and because it wanted a way to introduce unrelated, but extremely prejudicial evidence of alleged sexual abuse through the back door. The simple, non-prejudicial, solution is to sever the Perjury Counts.7",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "CONCLUSION",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "The Perjury Counts are improperly joined with the Mann Act Counts. A joint trial of these charges would deny Ms. Maxwell her right to a fair trial and her counsel. Accordingly, the Court should grant the request for a separate trial on the Perjury Counts.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Dated: March 15, 2021 Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "7 Ms. Maxwell's Colorado Counsel would not participate as advocates in any trial of those charges but would testify as witnesses.",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "11 DOJ-OGR-00003912",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Ms. Maxwell",
  51. "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca"
  52. ],
  53. "organizations": [],
  54. "locations": [
  55. "Colorado"
  56. ],
  57. "dates": [
  58. "March 15, 2021",
  59. "04/20/21"
  60. ],
  61. "reference_numbers": [
  62. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  63. "Document 224",
  64. "DOJ-OGR-00003912"
  65. ]
  66. },
  67. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document includes a signature block with the name 'Jeffrey S. Pagliuca'."
  68. }