| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "15",
- "document_number": "224",
- "date": "04/20/21",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 224 Filed 04/20/21 Page 15 of 17 one or more of Ms. Maxwell's lawyers should become actual witnesses, a circumstance that would create a circus, not a fair trial. The truth of the matter is simple: the government included the Perjury Counts because it wants to call Ms. Maxwell a liar in front of the jury and because it wanted a way to introduce unrelated, but extremely prejudicial evidence of alleged sexual abuse through the back door. The simple, non-prejudicial, solution is to sever the Perjury Counts.7 CONCLUSION The Perjury Counts are improperly joined with the Mann Act Counts. A joint trial of these charges would deny Ms. Maxwell her right to a fair trial and her counsel. Accordingly, the Court should grant the request for a separate trial on the Perjury Counts. Dated: March 15, 2021 Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca 7 Ms. Maxwell's Colorado Counsel would not participate as advocates in any trial of those charges but would testify as witnesses. 11 DOJ-OGR-00003912",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 224 Filed 04/20/21 Page 15 of 17",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "one or more of Ms. Maxwell's lawyers should become actual witnesses, a circumstance that would create a circus, not a fair trial. The truth of the matter is simple: the government included the Perjury Counts because it wants to call Ms. Maxwell a liar in front of the jury and because it wanted a way to introduce unrelated, but extremely prejudicial evidence of alleged sexual abuse through the back door. The simple, non-prejudicial, solution is to sever the Perjury Counts.7",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "CONCLUSION",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "The Perjury Counts are improperly joined with the Mann Act Counts. A joint trial of these charges would deny Ms. Maxwell her right to a fair trial and her counsel. Accordingly, the Court should grant the request for a separate trial on the Perjury Counts.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Dated: March 15, 2021 Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "7 Ms. Maxwell's Colorado Counsel would not participate as advocates in any trial of those charges but would testify as witnesses.",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "11 DOJ-OGR-00003912",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ms. Maxwell",
- "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [
- "Colorado"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "March 15, 2021",
- "04/20/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "Document 224",
- "DOJ-OGR-00003912"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document includes a signature block with the name 'Jeffrey S. Pagliuca'."
- }
|