mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00011975.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "203",
    "document_number": "743",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 203 of 247 331 LBUCmax5 Jane - direct grateful for everything they were doing for her. THE COURT: And you're not seeking to offer that information for the truth, but for the effect that it had on the witness? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: So you'll accept a limiting instruction? MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. THE COURT: Ms. Menninger. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think the simple way to ask the question is, how did you feel, and if it was based on something your mother said to you, without getting into the content of what the mother had communicated to her. I think it's a real issue that may come up later with things that the mother has said to any number of people, and I feel like this opens the door to many other conversations that relate to the mother. So I'm not sure that just asking -- giving a bunch of hearsay from the mom, saying we're asking it for the effect on the listener and precluding cross examination about other conversations with the mom would be appropriate. THE COURT: So I don't know what you have in mind coming down the road. I think it's proffered by the government at this point anyway. I think there might be a way to streamline it. Ms. Moe, maybe you could think about that. But as proffered by the government, it's not being SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011975",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 203 of 247 331",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBUCmax5 Jane - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "grateful for everything they were doing for her. THE COURT: And you're not seeking to offer that information for the truth, but for the effect that it had on the witness? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: So you'll accept a limiting instruction? MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. THE COURT: Ms. Menninger. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think the simple way to ask the question is, how did you feel, and if it was based on something your mother said to you, without getting into the content of what the mother had communicated to her. I think it's a real issue that may come up later with things that the mother has said to any number of people, and I feel like this opens the door to many other conversations that relate to the mother. So I'm not sure that just asking -- giving a bunch of hearsay from the mom, saying we're asking it for the effect on the listener and precluding cross examination about other conversations with the mom would be appropriate. THE COURT: So I don't know what you have in mind coming down the road. I think it's proffered by the government at this point anyway. I think there might be a way to streamline it. Ms. Moe, maybe you could think about that. But as proffered by the government, it's not being",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011975",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "743",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011975"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}