mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012169.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "149",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 264 560 LC1Qmax4 Jane - Cross 1 complicated legal terms about a settlement agreement between this witness and an estate that's not a party to this case. We think this document is confusing to the jury and don't understand any potential impeachment relevance of the particular terms of the settlement. 6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, it's a representative -- it's a documentary representative of the amount of money that she received in the settlement. I don't know what's confusing about that. I am not going to spend a lot of time arguing some legal clauses or anything like that, but I think our jury is sophisticated enough to know what a settlement agreement looks like and the amount of money that she received. She's contesting that that's the amount of money she received, but I don't think that precluding us from putting in a document because it has legal language in it is an appropriate -- 16 THE COURT: That's the 403 argument, that it's legal language? 18 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 19 THE COURT: The government puts in cooperation agreements all the time. Those are not the models of clarity. 21 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor, and that's certainly true -- 23 THE COURT: This is comparable legal language, isn't it? 24 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. I think the difference SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012169",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 264 560 LC1Qmax4 Jane - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 complicated legal terms about a settlement agreement between this witness and an estate that's not a party to this case. We think this document is confusing to the jury and don't understand any potential impeachment relevance of the particular terms of the settlement. 6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, it's a representative -- it's a documentary representative of the amount of money that she received in the settlement. I don't know what's confusing about that. I am not going to spend a lot of time arguing some legal clauses or anything like that, but I think our jury is sophisticated enough to know what a settlement agreement looks like and the amount of money that she received. She's contesting that that's the amount of money she received, but I don't think that precluding us from putting in a document because it has legal language in it is an appropriate -- 16 THE COURT: That's the 403 argument, that it's legal language? 18 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 19 THE COURT: The government puts in cooperation agreements all the time. Those are not the models of clarity. 21 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor, and that's certainly true -- 23 THE COURT: This is comparable legal language, isn't it? 24 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. I think the difference",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012169",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012169"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about the admissibility of a settlement agreement. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps."
}