mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012177.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "157",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 157 of 264 568 LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross 1 it would -- it might have some impact -- my participating would have some impact on the civil litigation, do you have additional questions? 4 MS. MENNINGER: May I confer, your Honor? 5 THE COURT: Yes. 6 (Counsel conferred) 7 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I suppose that there might be additional question -- you know that your lawyer told the government that. 10 THE COURT: So however she answers that, I suppose you want to ask, Do you know that your lawyer told the government that? 13 MS. MENNINGER: Yes. 14 THE COURT: Do you have an objection to the \"Do you know that your lawyer told the government that\"? 16 MS. MOE: I'm sorry, your Honor. I'm trying to follow the logic of trying to impeach a witness by her knowledge of an attorney's statement to the government about a client's intention. I don't think that tracks the logic of impeachment by bias or by a prior inconsistent statement. I'm not sure how that establishes impeachment under the rule. 22 THE COURT: The fact that she knows her lawyer told the government that. 24 MS. MOE: Your Honor, that appears to be an end-run around getting in her conversations with her attorney. Because 25 SOUTERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012177",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 157 of 264 568",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 it would -- it might have some impact -- my participating would have some impact on the civil litigation, do you have additional questions? 4 MS. MENNINGER: May I confer, your Honor? 5 THE COURT: Yes. 6 (Counsel conferred) 7 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I suppose that there might be additional question -- you know that your lawyer told the government that. 10 THE COURT: So however she answers that, I suppose you want to ask, Do you know that your lawyer told the government that? 13 MS. MENNINGER: Yes. 14 THE COURT: Do you have an objection to the \"Do you know that your lawyer told the government that\"? 16 MS. MOE: I'm sorry, your Honor. I'm trying to follow the logic of trying to impeach a witness by her knowledge of an attorney's statement to the government about a client's intention. I don't think that tracks the logic of impeachment by bias or by a prior inconsistent statement. I'm not sure how that establishes impeachment under the rule. 22 THE COURT: The fact that she knows her lawyer told the government that. 24 MS. MOE: Your Honor, that appears to be an end-run around getting in her conversations with her attorney. Because",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012177",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012177"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}