mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012178.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "158",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 158 of 264 LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross 1 the question is, Are you aware that your attorney made a statement to the government about his conversation with you about your expected outcome in the case. THE COURT: Well, okay. At the first step, you agree they can ask if she had any basis to believe that her participation as a witness here would have any impact on her potential compensation in civil litigation. You don't object to that question? MS. MOE: No, your Honor, no objection. THE COURT: So then we have what if she says yes and what if she says no. So if she says yes, their follow-up question is, Are you aware that your attorney told the government that? I think I agree with you. I don't know what the relevance of that is. And it is an attorney-client communication. What's the relevance of whether she knows her attorney told the government that? MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think it gets into her expectations that she -- that the government knows that she knows. And so at that point she's testifying with an expectation that -- you know, if the government doesn't -- is unaware of her attorney's advice, then it's just a secret between her and her attorney. But if the government who is calling her to testify is aware of her plan, intent to get more SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012178",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 158 of 264 LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 the question is, Are you aware that your attorney made a statement to the government about his conversation with you about your expected outcome in the case. THE COURT: Well, okay. At the first step, you agree they can ask if she had any basis to believe that her participation as a witness here would have any impact on her potential compensation in civil litigation. You don't object to that question? MS. MOE: No, your Honor, no objection. THE COURT: So then we have what if she says yes and what if she says no. So if she says yes, their follow-up question is, Are you aware that your attorney told the government that? I think I agree with you. I don't know what the relevance of that is. And it is an attorney-client communication. What's the relevance of whether she knows her attorney told the government that? MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think it gets into her expectations that she -- that the government knows that she knows. And so at that point she's testifying with an expectation that -- you know, if the government doesn't -- is unaware of her attorney's advice, then it's just a secret between her and her attorney. But if the government who is calling her to testify is aware of her plan, intent to get more",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012178",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "government"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012178"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}