mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012181.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "161",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 161 of 264 572\nLC1VMAX5 Jane - cross\n1 certainly has a position, I'm sure.\n2 MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor.\n3 I would just want to make sure I was conferring with\n4 her counsel about that issue and being mindful.\n5 Broadly speaking, your Honor, to the extent this\n6 evidence is offered for the purpose of impeaching the\n7 credibility of the prosecutors in this case, which is what I\n8 think what Ms. Menninger was suggesting, I think that would be\n9 entirely improper.\n10 THE COURT: I think that's, in part, like the\n11 mysterious implication of the second question that I said I\n12 wouldn't allow.\n13 MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Because it just doesn't match up to\n15 anything in motivating her.\n16 So we know where the branch of the tree ends. If the\n17 question is yes, that's the end of it. If the question is no,\n18 then it sounds like we're done with this witness with that\n19 question. And then you're going to brief calling her lawyer\n20 only on the question of whether he told the government that her\n21 participating -- testifying would help her civil case.\n22 MS. MENNINGER: He told her that. No, he told Jane\n23 that.\n24 THE COURT: Right.\n25 MS. MENNINGER: Yes. And, your Honor, that would be\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012181",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 161 of 264 572",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 certainly has a position, I'm sure.\n2 MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor.\n3 I would just want to make sure I was conferring with\n4 her counsel about that issue and being mindful.\n5 Broadly speaking, your Honor, to the extent this\n6 evidence is offered for the purpose of impeaching the\n7 credibility of the prosecutors in this case, which is what I\n8 think what Ms. Menninger was suggesting, I think that would be\n9 entirely improper.\n10 THE COURT: I think that's, in part, like the\n11 mysterious implication of the second question that I said I\n12 wouldn't allow.\n13 MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Because it just doesn't match up to\n15 anything in motivating her.\n16 So we know where the branch of the tree ends. If the\n17 question is yes, that's the end of it. If the question is no,\n18 then it sounds like we're done with this witness with that\n19 question. And then you're going to brief calling her lawyer\n20 only on the question of whether he told the government that her\n21 participating -- testifying would help her civil case.\n22 MS. MENNINGER: He told her that. No, he told Jane\n23 that.\n24 THE COURT: Right.\n25 MS. MENNINGER: Yes. And, your Honor, that would be",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012181",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Mode",
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012181"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some handwritten notes in the margin. The text is mostly clear, but there may be some minor formatting issues due to the original document's layout."
}