DOJ-OGR-00012193.json 3.5 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "173",
  4. "document_number": "745",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 264 584 LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross 1 and J-9. 2 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor, that are unredacted. 3 THE COURT: Yes. Without objection, Ms. Moe? 4 MS. MOE: No objection, your Honor. 5 THE WITNESS: Okay. 6 BY MS. MENNINGER: 7 Q. Does looking at that document refresh your recollection about a lawsuit that you and your mother filed against your teacher? 8 9 A. No, I literally had no idea she did this. 10 Q. You recognize the name of the teacher -- 11 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. -- as the same person who was on your Interlochen application we looked at earlier; correct? 14 15 A. Yes. 16 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor. We're now testifying about documents not in evidence. 17 18 THE COURT: That's true. 19 I'll allow that question and then you're not going to do more. You asked if it refreshed her recollection. The answer is clearly -- is no. She's answered the same way. 20 21 So let's go. 22 23 MS. MENNINGER: I'm a little unclear, your Honor. And I don't know if we need a sidebar, because there are two other names that -- without my saying them out loud to ask her if she 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012193",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 264 584",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "handwritten",
  19. "content": "Jane - cross",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 and J-9. 2 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor, that are unredacted. 3 THE COURT: Yes. Without objection, Ms. Moe? 4 MS. MOE: No objection, your Honor. 5 THE WITNESS: Okay. 6 BY MS. MENNINGER: 7 Q. Does looking at that document refresh your recollection about a lawsuit that you and your mother filed against your teacher? 8 9 A. No, I literally had no idea she did this. 10 Q. You recognize the name of the teacher -- 11 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. -- as the same person who was on your Interlochen application we looked at earlier; correct? 14 15 A. Yes. 16 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor. We're now testifying about documents not in evidence. 17 18 THE COURT: That's true. 19 I'll allow that question and then you're not going to do more. You asked if it refreshed her recollection. The answer is clearly -- is no. She's answered the same way. 20 21 So let's go. 22 23 MS. MENNINGER: I'm a little unclear, your Honor. And I don't know if we need a sidebar, because there are two other names that -- without my saying them out loud to ask her if she 24 25",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012193",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "MS. MENNINGER",
  41. "MS. MOE",
  42. "THE COURT",
  43. "THE WITNESS"
  44. ],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  47. "Interlochen"
  48. ],
  49. "locations": [],
  50. "dates": [
  51. "08/10/22"
  52. ],
  53. "reference_numbers": [
  54. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  55. "745",
  56. "DOJ-OGR-00012193"
  57. ]
  58. },
  59. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  60. }