mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012236.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "216",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 264 627 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect be recall that would prohibit the government from conferring with a witness who's completed their testimony? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We just wanted to navigate that, otherwise I think we would make arrangements for Jane to travel home to her family today. And so if we wanted to make those arrangements, we will need to be in touch with her to make those arrangements, otherwise not planning to have substantive communications, but I wanted to be very transparent and candid about those contacts and just the state-of-play on this issue. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, my recollection is that there was a second witness who was going to be offering prior consistent statements for Jane. MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I think our preference would be for Jane to be permitted to leave the district, but if we can be in touch with her about the possibility of a need for recall after today, if there are additional prior consistent statements, we can navigate it that way. Otherwise, Jane would have to remain in the district for I think potentially a long time. MS. MENNINGER: I have no objection to that, your Honor. I do have one clarifying question, which is, while not observing the trial in the courtroom, there is certainly substantial coverage of the trial including relaying witnesses' testimony. So I don't know whether that has been clarified SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012236",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 264 627 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "be recall that would prohibit the government from conferring with a witness who's completed their testimony? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We just wanted to navigate that, otherwise I think we would make arrangements for Jane to travel home to her family today. And so if we wanted to make those arrangements, we will need to be in touch with her to make those arrangements, otherwise not planning to have substantive communications, but I wanted to be very transparent and candid about those contacts and just the state-of-play on this issue. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, my recollection is that there was a second witness who was going to be offering prior consistent statements for Jane. MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I think our preference would be for Jane to be permitted to leave the district, but if we can be in touch with her about the possibility of a need for recall after today, if there are additional prior consistent statements, we can navigate it that way. Otherwise, Jane would have to remain in the district for I think potentially a long time. MS. MENNINGER: I have no objection to that, your Honor. I do have one clarifying question, which is, while not observing the trial in the courtroom, there is certainly substantial coverage of the trial including relaying witnesses' testimony. So I don't know whether that has been clarified",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012236",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "216",
      "264",
      "627",
      "LC1Qmax6",
      "(212) 805-0300",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012236"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}