DOJ-OGR-00012258.json 3.2 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "238",
  4. "document_number": "745",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 264 649 LC1VMAX7 Matt - direct frustration about that. That is entirely consistent with her testimony that she was, in fact, abused. MS. STERNHEIM: But not with regard to her mother having a confrontation. THE COURT: Well, it's a prior consistent statement that he heard related to the abuse which you've repeatedly called into question in your opening and your direct and in your cross-examination. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I understand that. But we're talking about prior consistent statements. THE COURT: Right. The prior consistent statement is that she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. MS. STERNHEIM: But they are bringing out a conversation. If she wants to say, Did you know or learn that she was abused? Yes. But a conversation that she had with her mother is hearsay. MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not hearsay because it's a prior consistent statement of Jane about her experiencing sexual abuse. THE COURT: Yes. Overruled. (Continued on next page) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012258",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 264 649",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC1VMAX7 Matt - direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "frustration about that. That is entirely consistent with her testimony that she was, in fact, abused. MS. STERNHEIM: But not with regard to her mother having a confrontation. THE COURT: Well, it's a prior consistent statement that he heard related to the abuse which you've repeatedly called into question in your opening and your direct and in your cross-examination. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I understand that. But we're talking about prior consistent statements. THE COURT: Right. The prior consistent statement is that she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. MS. STERNHEIM: But they are bringing out a conversation. If she wants to say, Did you know or learn that she was abused? Yes. But a conversation that she had with her mother is hearsay. MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not hearsay because it's a prior consistent statement of Jane about her experiencing sexual abuse. THE COURT: Yes. Overruled. (Continued on next page)",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012258",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  41. "Jane",
  42. "MS. STERNHEIM",
  43. "MS. MOE"
  44. ],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  47. ],
  48. "locations": [],
  49. "dates": [
  50. "08/10/22"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  54. "745",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00012258"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }