mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012281.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "261",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 264 673 LC1VMAX7\n\n1 (At sidebar - not sealed)\n2 THE COURT: Okay. See you 8:45.\n3 The only thing I wanted to -- this isn't sealed. But timing, if you're going to brief piercing the privilege.\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: When would you like it, your Honor?\n5\n6 THE COURT: A month ago.\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: We can turn back the hands of time.\n8 THE COURT: I wish we could.\n9 MS. STERNHEIM: I don't think you would.\n10 We might, but not you.\n11 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think it's a little more complicated than -- I think there are different issues related to different potential witnesses, I guess is the issue.\n12\n13 I'm happy to have it briefed as best we can under the facts that we know right now, assuming that the Court wants briefed is the issue we discussed today. Okay. Because then we may have issues related to lawyer witnesses that are under subpoena, but will not be called under any circumstances unless it's briefed and the Court gives permission for the calling of those witnesses.\n14\n15 THE COURT: Let's start with the limited issue that was raised today, which is that you would call -- you're seeking to call Glassman.\n16\n17 MR. PAGLIUCA: Glassman.\n18\n19 THE COURT: You're seeking to call Glassman on the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012281",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 261 of 264 673 LC1VMAX7",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(At sidebar - not sealed)\nTHE COURT: Okay. See you 8:45.\nThe only thing I wanted to -- this isn't sealed. But timing, if you're going to brief piercing the privilege.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: When would you like it, your Honor?\nTHE COURT: A month ago.\nMS. STERNHEIM: We can turn back the hands of time.\nTHE COURT: I wish we could.\nMS. STERNHEIM: I don't think you would.\nWe might, but not you.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: I think it's a little more complicated than -- I think there are different issues related to different potential witnesses, I guess is the issue.\nI'm happy to have it briefed as best we can under the facts that we know right now, assuming that the Court wants briefed is the issue we discussed today. Okay. Because then we may have issues related to lawyer witnesses that are under subpoena, but will not be called under any circumstances unless it's briefed and the Court gives permission for the calling of those witnesses.\nTHE COURT: Let's start with the limited issue that was raised today, which is that you would call -- you're seeking to call Glassman.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Glassman.\nTHE COURT: You're seeking to call Glassman on the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012281",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "Glassman"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012281"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}