mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012282.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "262",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 264 674 LC1VMAX7\n\n1 narrow question of whether under theory of waiver he told Jane\n2 that it would -- testifying would help her in her case.\n3 When would you like to do that?\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: How about Friday, your Honor?\n5 THE COURT: This would be a witness you would call in\n6 your case-in-chief?\n7 MR. PAGLIUCA: Exactly. So it's at least a week from\n8 now, I would imagine. I'm assuming the government has about a\n9 week more of testimony, by my review of the witness list.\n10 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think that's right. We're\n11 unlikely to rest in less than a week from now.\n12 THE COURT: So is Friday okay?\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: We can respond on Monday, if that's all\n14 right.\n15 THE COURT: Sure. Great.\n16 It will provide some general background on piercing\n17 privilege and waiver to the extent that will inform issues\n18 beyond the specific.\n19 MR. PAGLIUCA: To the extent we can preview the\n20 additional issues, we'll get that underway as well so that you\n21 have a sense of what may or may not be coming down the road\n22 here.\n23 THE COURT: Okay. Can I ask, thinking about timing,\n24 now that we're where we are, what is your estimate for the\n25 trial?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012282",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 264 674 LC1VMAX7",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 narrow question of whether under theory of waiver he told Jane\n2 that it would -- testifying would help her in her case.\n3 When would you like to do that?\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: How about Friday, your Honor?\n5 THE COURT: This would be a witness you would call in\n6 your case-in-chief?\n7 MR. PAGLIUCA: Exactly. So it's at least a week from\n8 now, I would imagine. I'm assuming the government has about a\n9 week more of testimony, by my review of the witness list.\n10 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think that's right. We're\n11 unlikely to rest in less than a week from now.\n12 THE COURT: So is Friday okay?\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: We can respond on Monday, if that's all\n14 right.\n15 THE COURT: Sure. Great.\n16 It will provide some general background on piercing\n17 privilege and waiver to the extent that will inform issues\n18 beyond the specific.\n19 MR. PAGLIUCA: To the extent we can preview the\n20 additional issues, we'll get that underway as well so that you\n21 have a sense of what may or may not be coming down the road\n22 here.\n23 THE COURT: Okay. Can I ask, thinking about timing,\n24 now that we're where we are, what is your estimate for the\n25 trial?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012282",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012282"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}