mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012288.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 228 679 LC2Qmax1 additional issue that I think would relate to this issue. This witness is -- I'd say it's more of a 803(6) issue with this witness likely than a 901 issue, your Honor. And I think we're implicating 803(6) subsections (C), I think (D) and (E) likely with this particular witness. THE COURT: Okay. Just give me a minute. Understood. MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, I would just point out that neither of these documents are being offered for the truth of the matter. The household manual is being offered as a set of instructions, it's a document of instructions which have no truth value themselves, and the contact book is not being offered to show that any of the entries are in fact the contact information of any of the people listed therein. It's being offered to show that the defendant was in possession of a book which contained -- which purported to contain this information. So, in either sense, 803(6) -- the government does not expect 803(6) to be implicated by the testimony when it offers the exhibits. THE COURT: Do you want to respond to that, Mr. Pagliuca? MR. PAGLIUCA: I think then this implicates some relevance issues, your Honor. THE COURT: I'm sorry, it implicates? MR. PAGLIUCA: Relevance issues. I mean, I dispute the characterization that the defendant is in possession of a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012288",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 228 679 LC2Qmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "additional issue that I think would relate to this issue. This witness is -- I'd say it's more of a 803(6) issue with this witness likely than a 901 issue, your Honor. And I think we're implicating 803(6) subsections (C), I think (D) and (E) likely with this particular witness. THE COURT: Okay. Just give me a minute. Understood. MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, I would just point out that neither of these documents are being offered for the truth of the matter. The household manual is being offered as a set of instructions, it's a document of instructions which have no truth value themselves, and the contact book is not being offered to show that any of the entries are in fact the contact information of any of the people listed therein. It's being offered to show that the defendant was in possession of a book which contained -- which purported to contain this information. So, in either sense, 803(6) -- the government does not expect 803(6) to be implicated by the testimony when it offers the exhibits. THE COURT: Do you want to respond to that, Mr. Pagliuca? MR. PAGLIUCA: I think then this implicates some relevance issues, your Honor. THE COURT: I'm sorry, it implicates? MR. PAGLIUCA: Relevance issues. I mean, I dispute the characterization that the defendant is in possession of a",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012288",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Pagliuca"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012288"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}