mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012289.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 228 680 LC2Qmax1 book or even that particular book. THE COURT: That's the factual dispute that goes to authenticity, and then if it comes in, whether the jury believes the testimony regarding that. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, but, you know, I think -- THE COURT: I gather the point here is there's nothing from these exhibits that the government would argue at closing the jury should conclude factually based on the statements contained in either document. MR. PAGLIUCA: See, I don't think that's true, your Honor, and I think that's my next point because I think it's a little fast and loose to say that it's not being offered for the truth. I mean, that's convenient to get around of the hearsay objection. THE COURT: Sometimes it works. MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. THE COURT: Sometimes it doesn't. MR. PAGLIUCA: But it is being offered for the truth in my view: The truth that these people's names are in there; the truth that these people had some sort of contact. This is all part and parcel of the government's theory that this list has something to do with, you know, underage females and their names are on the list, etc., etc. So, I don't think you can say this is being offered to show what, notice? It doesn't SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012289",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 228 680 LC2Qmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "book or even that particular book. THE COURT: That's the factual dispute that goes to authenticity, and then if it comes in, whether the jury believes the testimony regarding that. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, but, you know, I think -- THE COURT: I gather the point here is there's nothing from these exhibits that the government would argue at closing the jury should conclude factually based on the statements contained in either document. MR. PAGLIUCA: See, I don't think that's true, your Honor, and I think that's my next point because I think it's a little fast and loose to say that it's not being offered for the truth. I mean, that's convenient to get around of the hearsay objection. THE COURT: Sometimes it works. MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. THE COURT: Sometimes it doesn't. MR. PAGLIUCA: But it is being offered for the truth in my view: The truth that these people's names are in there; the truth that these people had some sort of contact. This is all part and parcel of the government's theory that this list has something to do with, you know, underage females and their names are on the list, etc., etc. So, I don't think you can say this is being offered to show what, notice? It doesn't",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012289",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012289"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}