mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012360.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "75",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 228\nLC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct\n1 (Counsel conferred)\n2 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the issue or the concern from the government is that --\n3 THE COURT: Can we start with the answer to my question, and then tell me what the issue is.\n4 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, unfortunately, I think the question -- the answer is a little complicated because --\n5 THE COURT: I can handle it.\n6 MS. POMERANTZ: In the sense that I don't -- your Honor, I have no doubt in that. I meant that it's not a yes or no answer; because I'm a little unclear on what Mr. Pagliuca is intending to do.\n7 THE COURT: We're going to see and there might be a line, but that's why I want to just start with the first question, right.\n8 So the first question is you made a scope objection. The witness testified about delayed disclosure in the context of sexual abuse. Is it fair cross to ask if there are other reasons for delayed disclosure?\n9 MS. POMERANTZ: I believe so, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Okay. So then tell me where you think the line turns from that fair cross into soliciting opinions.\n11 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the concern is where Mr. Pagliuca intends to ask questions about, you know, You're aware there's theory about X, certain topics. But she\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012360",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 228",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Counsel conferred)\nMS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the issue or the concern from the government is that --\nTHE COURT: Can we start with the answer to my question, and then tell me what the issue is.\nMS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, unfortunately, I think the question -- the answer is a little complicated because --\nTHE COURT: I can handle it.\nMS. POMERANTZ: In the sense that I don't -- your Honor, I have no doubt in that. I meant that it's not a yes or no answer; because I'm a little unclear on what Mr. Pagliuca is intending to do.\nTHE COURT: We're going to see and there might be a line, but that's why I want to just start with the first question, right.\nSo the first question is you made a scope objection. The witness testified about delayed disclosure in the context of sexual abuse. Is it fair cross to ask if there are other reasons for delayed disclosure?\nMS. POMERANTZ: I believe so, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay. So then tell me where you think the line turns from that fair cross into soliciting opinions.\nMS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I think the concern is where Mr. Pagliuca intends to ask questions about, you know, You're aware there's theory about X, certain topics. But she",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012360",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "THE COURT",
      "Mr. Pagliuca"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012360"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}