mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012366.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "81",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 81 of 228 757 LC2Qmax3\n\n1 MR. PAGLIUCA: Ms. Menninger points out that she also\n2 said --\n3 THE COURT: Is that in the testimony?\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Two things. This is in my notes\n5 as well.\n6 Grooming not always easily detected, and these factors\n7 are not used to predict grooming. That's what she testified\n8 to.\n9 And the next-question is along the lines of, you know,\n10 you are deceiving those around you, and people don't\n11 necessarily know that they are being groomed along with the\n12 other individuals being groomed.\n13 So I do not have to call it hindsight bias.\n14 THE COURT: I don't see yet how that links up to the\n15 question that you gave me.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: It's a different --\n17 THE COURT: It sounds beyond the scope to me.\n18 MR. PAGLIUCA: It's a different question.\n19 THE COURT: What's the question?\n20 MR. PAGLIUCA: The question is the people who are\n21 grooming the environment are grooming the people around them\n22 and it is often difficult for the people that are -- that are\n23 in the environment being groomed to recognize that this\n24 grooming behavior is occurring.\n25 THE COURT: I would permit that question.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012366",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 81 of 228 757 LC2Qmax3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. PAGLIUCA: Ms. Menninger points out that she also\n2 said --\n3 THE COURT: Is that in the testimony?\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Two things. This is in my notes\n5 as well.\n6 Grooming not always easily detected, and these factors\n7 are not used to predict grooming. That's what she testified\n8 to.\n9 And the next-question is along the lines of, you know,\n10 you are deceiving those around you, and people don't\n11 necessarily know that they are being groomed along with the\n12 other individuals being groomed.\n13 So I do not have to call it hindsight bias.\n14 THE COURT: I don't see yet how that links up to the\n15 question that you gave me.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: It's a different --\n17 THE COURT: It sounds beyond the scope to me.\n18 MR. PAGLIUCA: It's a different question.\n19 THE COURT: What's the question?\n20 MR. PAGLIUCA: The question is the people who are\n21 grooming the environment are grooming the people around them\n22 and it is often difficult for the people that are -- that are\n23 in the environment being groomed to recognize that this\n24 grooming behavior is occurring.\n25 THE COURT: I would permit that question.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012366",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012366"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}