| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "90",
- "document_number": "747",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 90 of 228 766 LC2Qmax3 Rocchio - Cross close. Do you recall that? A. Disclose in disclosure when there is a close attachment between the perpetrator and the victim of child sexual abuse, yes. Q. Right. And when you say perpetrator, we're talking about an allegation. So you're making an assumption that someone is a perpetrator -- MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor. THE COURT: Overruled. Q. -- in that context, correct? A. No, I'm talking about the literature that's been done on child sexual abuse, so a significant amount of that literature is conducted by -- Q. That's fine, Dr. Rocchio. THE COURT: You may finish. You may finish. Go ahead. A. A significant amount of that literature has been conducted on known and corroborated or admitted -- MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as being -- THE COURT: You asked the question and then you interrupted halfway through. MR. PAGLIUCA: This is beyond the scope of my question. THE COURT: No, it's not. That's why I allowed the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012375",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 90 of 228 766",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LC2Qmax3 Rocchio - Cross",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "close. Do you recall that? A. Disclose in disclosure when there is a close attachment between the perpetrator and the victim of child sexual abuse, yes. Q. Right. And when you say perpetrator, we're talking about an allegation. So you're making an assumption that someone is a perpetrator -- MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor. THE COURT: Overruled. Q. -- in that context, correct? A. No, I'm talking about the literature that's been done on child sexual abuse, so a significant amount of that literature is conducted by -- Q. That's fine, Dr. Rocchio. THE COURT: You may finish. You may finish. Go ahead. A. A significant amount of that literature has been conducted on known and corroborated or admitted -- MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as being -- THE COURT: You asked the question and then you interrupted halfway through. MR. PAGLIUCA: This is beyond the scope of my question. THE COURT: No, it's not. That's why I allowed the",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012375",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Rocchio",
- "Pomerantz",
- "Pagliuca"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "747",
- "DOJ-OGR-00012375"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|