mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012461.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "176",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 176 of 228 852 LC2Qmax5 - corrected Alessi - Direct but the format was the same. Q. Format was the same. And are there some of the same contacts that you remember from when you worked for Mr. Epstein? A. Yes. Q. Based on your review of this book last night, do you think this is the same book that you saw when you were employed, or a later version from after you left working for Mr. Epstein? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection, your Honor. Lack of foundation. THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer. A. Yes, it was the same book. Q. Hold on. Do you think this was a later version after you left? A. This was a later version, yes, ma'am. MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection. THE COURT: Just a second. I'm going to sustain. The jury will disregard the last answer. You may rephrase. Q. Mr. Alessi, based on your review of this book, do you believe that this is the same book you saw when you worked for Mr. Epstein or a later version from after you left? A. This was a later version of book after I -- that it was printed probably after I left. Q. What makes you say that? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012461",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 176 of 228 852",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC2Qmax5 - corrected Alessi - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "but the format was the same. Q. Format was the same. And are there some of the same contacts that you remember from when you worked for Mr. Epstein? A. Yes. Q. Based on your review of this book last night, do you think this is the same book that you saw when you were employed, or a later version from after you left working for Mr. Epstein? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection, your Honor. Lack of foundation. THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer. A. Yes, it was the same book. Q. Hold on. Do you think this was a later version after you left? A. This was a later version, yes, ma'am. MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection. THE COURT: Just a second. I'm going to sustain. The jury will disregard the last answer. You may rephrase. Q. Mr. Alessi, based on your review of this book, do you believe that this is the same book you saw when you worked for Mr. Epstein or a later version from after you left? A. This was a later version of book after I -- that it was printed probably after I left. Q. What makes you say that?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012461",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Mr. Alessi",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012461"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}