| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "182",
- "document_number": "747",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 182 of 228 858 LC2Qmax5 - corrected Alessi - Direct you want to inquire, I'll allow that, and then I'll make my ruling. If 52 is admitted, I'll indicate that it's admitted in redacted form, and for those purposes, Mr. Pagliuca, you'd like the witness to compare each of the A, D, E, F, G, H pages to those in the book. MR. PAGLIUCA: I think the answer to that question is depending on whether the Court admits it or not, then we don't need to make a copy. If the Court is not going to admit it, then we don't get to the 52. If the Court does admit it, I do not need an on-the-record comparison because we've dealt with, I think, the issue. I accept that the government is going to say, and I agree, that they, they, the government, have copied those pages. That was not the problem of my objection. It was the rest of this format of how this was being done. So I think if it's admitted, they say: Here's 52. Is that a copy of a page out of the book? Yes. Okay, fine. And we move on. Because the actual substance has been admitted, we don't have to deal with -- copies are the same. THE COURT: How about this: If I sustain the objection, that's the end of it. If I overrule the objection, 52 will be admitted in redacted form, and then you can stipulate to the government's 52A, D, E, F, G and H being true and correct photocopies of five pages from 52. Is that reasonable? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012467",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 182 of 228 858 LC2Qmax5 - corrected Alessi - Direct",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "you want to inquire, I'll allow that, and then I'll make my ruling. If 52 is admitted, I'll indicate that it's admitted in redacted form, and for those purposes, Mr. Pagliuca, you'd like the witness to compare each of the A, D, E, F, G, H pages to those in the book. MR. PAGLIUCA: I think the answer to that question is depending on whether the Court admits it or not, then we don't need to make a copy. If the Court is not going to admit it, then we don't get to the 52. If the Court does admit it, I do not need an on-the-record comparison because we've dealt with, I think, the issue. I accept that the government is going to say, and I agree, that they, they, the government, have copied those pages. That was not the problem of my objection. It was the rest of this format of how this was being done. So I think if it's admitted, they say: Here's 52. Is that a copy of a page out of the book? Yes. Okay, fine. And we move on. Because the actual substance has been admitted, we don't have to deal with -- copies are the same. THE COURT: How about this: If I sustain the objection, that's the end of it. If I overrule the objection, 52 will be admitted in redacted form, and then you can stipulate to the government's 52A, D, E, F, G and H being true and correct photocopies of five pages from 52. Is that reasonable?",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012467",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Pagliuca"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "747",
- "DOJ-OGR-00012467"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
- }
|