mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012517.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 236 907 LBUCmax1\n1 of pulling down her underwear exposing her buttocks. That was excluded by your Honor on motions in limine. There is a similar photo, it's the same photo. The one we excluded was that photograph which was hanging on the wall, it was on the floor, but Government Exhibit 270 was the same photograph on the wall. There is consent to that one. Yes, we agreed that that would not be offered. So 270 is not going to be offered.\n\nThere was one that we didn't reach agreement on, which is Government Exhibit 250. In the motions in limine, your Honor, you excluded Government Exhibit 251, which, if you recall, was a photograph of a toddler, an infant walking forward towards the camera with an adult in the back, naked, and excluded it on 401 and 403 grounds.\n\nThere is another photo, which is Government Exhibit 250, which shows -- maybe we can pull that up if we can see it. Is it on your screen, your Honor?\nTHE COURT: Yes.\nMR. EVERDELL: That, as you can see, depicts Jeffrey Epstein with a slightly older girl. At this point, I believe it is the same girl with her lying across his lap with her bottom -- although with underwear on, but he's got his head down close to the bottom.\nI think, for similar reasons, this is not relevant and is prejudicial. It shows him with a prepubescent girl. There is no allegation that he or Ms. Maxwell, for that matter, were\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012517",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 236 907 LBUCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 of pulling down her underwear exposing her buttocks. That was excluded by your Honor on motions in limine. There is a similar photo, it's the same photo. The one we excluded was that photograph which was hanging on the wall, it was on the floor, but Government Exhibit 270 was the same photograph on the wall. There is consent to that one. Yes, we agreed that that would not be offered. So 270 is not going to be offered.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There was one that we didn't reach agreement on, which is Government Exhibit 250. In the motions in limine, your Honor, you excluded Government Exhibit 251, which, if you recall, was a photograph of a toddler, an infant walking forward towards the camera with an adult in the back, naked, and excluded it on 401 and 403 grounds.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There is another photo, which is Government Exhibit 250, which shows -- maybe we can pull that up if we can see it. Is it on your screen, your Honor?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Yes.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. EVERDELL: That, as you can see, depicts Jeffrey Epstein with a slightly older girl. At this point, I believe it is the same girl with her lying across his lap with her bottom -- although with underwear on, but he's got his head down close to the bottom.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "I think, for similar reasons, this is not relevant and is prejudicial. It shows him with a prepubescent girl. There is no allegation that he or Ms. Maxwell, for that matter, were",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012517",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "270",
      "250",
      "251",
      "401",
      "403",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012517"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about evidence and exhibits. The text is mostly printed, with some dialogue between MR. EVERDELL and THE COURT. There are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
}