mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012523.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "9",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 236 913 LBUCmax1 made those arguments before. If the Court already excluded that very photograph for those reasons, then it's got to be the case that we exclude it in the video for those same reasons. I don't see that the placement and the argument the government is making, it is still those 403 problems and the relevance problems, too, that mean that this should not be seen by the jury, regardless where it's placed or what arguments the defense has made. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think the prejudice will be very restricted here. I do not intend to linger over the photograph or pause while playing it. It will just show the context of the full decorations of the area around the master bedroom that the defendant shared with Jeffrey Epstein. I think that probative value is not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, particularly when it is in the context of the video showing the entire decorations. THE COURT: I'm overruling the objection. I think the context is different than the photo in isolation. You'll propose a limiting instruction along the line of what you've indicated. MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: It is consistent with testimony regarding photographs of naked people in the house, it's corroborative of that. It strikes me as different in light of the evidence that's come in and the context in which it is. So I will SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012523",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 236 913 LBUCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "made those arguments before. If the Court already excluded that very photograph for those reasons, then it's got to be the case that we exclude it in the video for those same reasons. I don't see that the placement and the argument the government is making, it is still those 403 problems and the relevance problems, too, that mean that this should not be seen by the jury, regardless where it's placed or what arguments the defense has made.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think the prejudice will be very restricted here. I do not intend to linger over the photograph or pause while playing it. It will just show the context of the full decorations of the area around the master bedroom that the defendant shared with Jeffrey Epstein. I think that probative value is not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, particularly when it is in the context of the video showing the entire decorations.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: I'm overruling the objection. I think the context is different than the photo in isolation. You'll propose a limiting instruction along the line of what you've indicated.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: It is consistent with testimony regarding photographs of naked people in the house, it's corroborative of that. It strikes me as different in light of the evidence that's come in and the context in which it is. So I will",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012523",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012523"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about the admissibility of a video and photograph as evidence. The conversation is between MS. COMEY and THE COURT."
}