mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012526.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "12",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 236 916 LBUCmax1 reasons that your Honor excluded. If it's displayed behind his desk, yes, that may be the case, but the fact remains, we have issues with this jury seeing photographs like this and making assumptions about what people were doing or not doing. There are no allegations in this case that Jeffrey Epstein was attracted to prepubescent girls, and they will potentially draw the wrong conclusion about a photograph of somebody with his goddaughter in some sort of playful moment, it would appear - maybe not everybody does this with their goddaughters, but it's certainly nothing illegal - and they will look at this and assume that his predilections strayed not just to young girls, but to prepubescent girls. It's similar, not just in context, this photograph is a closeup photograph of that photograph, the same way that Government Exhibit 288, which your Honor already excluded about the girl with the underwear exposing her bottom was not in context enough to respond to this argument, it is the same issue. You're looking at a photograph of the photograph by itself without context showing what it shows, and the jury is going to draw an improper conclusion. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, the jury will see the photograph after seeing a series of photographs of the bookshelves around Jeffrey Epstein's desk. I'm not sure I understand what argument the defense is making. Is this an innocent photograph that's just normal behavior between a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012526",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 236 916 LBUCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "reasons that your Honor excluded. If it's displayed behind his desk, yes, that may be the case, but the fact remains, we have issues with this jury seeing photographs like this and making assumptions about what people were doing or not doing. There are no allegations in this case that Jeffrey Epstein was attracted to prepubescent girls, and they will potentially draw the wrong conclusion about a photograph of somebody with his goddaughter in some sort of playful moment, it would appear - maybe not everybody does this with their goddaughters, but it's certainly nothing illegal - and they will look at this and assume that his predilections strayed not just to young girls, but to prepubescent girls. It's similar, not just in context, this photograph is a closeup photograph of that photograph, the same way that Government Exhibit 288, which your Honor already excluded about the girl with the underwear exposing her bottom was not in context enough to respond to this argument, it is the same issue. You're looking at a photograph of the photograph by itself without context showing what it shows, and the jury is going to draw an improper conclusion.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. COMEY: Your Honor, the jury will see the photograph after seeing a series of photographs of the bookshelves around Jeffrey Epstein's desk. I'm not sure I understand what argument the defense is making. Is this an innocent photograph that's just normal behavior between a",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012526",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012526",
      "288"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}