mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012537.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 236 927 LBUCmax1 are consistent with the way the witnesses have described, certainly rebuts that argument. It's not illegal to own schoolgirl costumes, but it directly speaks to a sexual preference for underage girls and its relevance is readily apparent in connection with the testimony in this case. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the fact that Jeffrey Epstein may have had schoolgirl costumes in 2019, 15 years after the conspiracy, is not probative of anything in this case. There is no link whatsoever to anything in this residence so far with Ms. Maxwell. We had testimony that she never lived in this residence. So I don't see how anything this attenuated that doesn't have a link to our client that is potentially prejudicial and there is no testimony establishing its relevance at all to begin with should be admitted before the jury. MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the timing issue, if defense counsel wants to argue to the jury that Jeffrey Epstein somehow developed his interest in underage girls after the timeframe of the charged conspiracy and in 2019, they're welcome to try to advance that argument, but otherwise I don't think the timing issue here is relevant. It's clear throughout the testimony of the witnesses and up to date that he maintain an interest in schoolgirls and that's why there were schoolgirl outfits in the residence. It's clearly SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012537",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 236 927 LBUCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "are consistent with the way the witnesses have described, certainly rebuts that argument. It's not illegal to own schoolgirl costumes, but it directly speaks to a sexual preference for underage girls and its relevance is readily apparent in connection with the testimony in this case. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the fact that Jeffrey Epstein may have had schoolgirl costumes in 2019, 15 years after the conspiracy, is not probative of anything in this case. There is no link whatsoever to anything in this residence so far with Ms. Maxwell. We had testimony that she never lived in this residence. So I don't see how anything this attenuated that doesn't have a link to our client that is potentially prejudicial and there is no testimony establishing its relevance at all to begin with should be admitted before the jury. MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the timing issue, if defense counsel wants to argue to the jury that Jeffrey Epstein somehow developed his interest in underage girls after the timeframe of the charged conspiracy and in 2019, they're welcome to try to advance that argument, but otherwise I don't think the timing issue here is relevant. It's clear throughout the testimony of the witnesses and up to date that he maintain an interest in schoolgirls and that's why there were schoolgirl outfits in the residence. It's clearly",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012537",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012537"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}