mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012538.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "24",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 24 of 236 928 LBUCmax1 probative of his sexual interest in underage girls, which the defense hat put at issue squarely in this case. This evidence is probative of that question. In particular, the fact that schoolgirl costumes, small ones, were found in the same floor of the house as a massage room where an underage girl was sexually abused is certainly probative. THE COURT: It seems to me that that evidence, as you alluded, Mr. Everdell, so I have my denial of the exclusion of witness 3. There are 412 issues in that, so that is sealed, I'm going to be cautious, but I think it's consistent with what I indicated would be permitted as testimony with regard to that witness. So, I think the arguments that are being made go as to timeframe, go to weight and not admissibility, and I will overrule the objection. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I could just make one request, which is if we're going to let that exhibit be admitted, that it be admitted subject to connection and not shown to the jurors until we have testimony that relates back to a particular victim in this case. MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court would prefer to either admit that evidence subject to connection or reserve on that issue, unless and until that witness testifies, we'd have no objection. Our argument remains the same that it is probative of his interest in underage girls, separate and apart from it being corroborative of any witness testimony that may SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012538",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 24 of 236 928 LBUCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "probative of his sexual interest in underage girls, which the defense hat put at issue squarely in this case. This evidence is probative of that question. In particular, the fact that schoolgirl costumes, small ones, were found in the same floor of the house as a massage room where an underage girl was sexually abused is certainly probative.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: It seems to me that that evidence, as you alluded, Mr. Everdell, so I have my denial of the exclusion of witness 3. There are 412 issues in that, so that is sealed, I'm going to be cautious, but I think it's consistent with what I indicated would be permitted as testimony with regard to that witness. So, I think the arguments that are being made go as to timeframe, go to weight and not admissibility, and I will overrule the objection.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I could just make one request, which is if we're going to let that exhibit be admitted, that it be admitted subject to connection and not shown to the jurors until we have testimony that relates back to a particular victim in this case.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court would prefer to either admit that evidence subject to connection or reserve on that issue, unless and until that witness testifies, we'd have no objection. Our argument remains the same that it is probative of his interest in underage girls, separate and apart from it being corroborative of any witness testimony that may",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012538",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012538"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}