mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012680.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "166",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 166 of 236 LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct reason most of that can't be a public document. And what you need to do, since narrow tailoring is required, is to make a public version so you redacted it to exclude the reading of the warrant. I don't see why a public version can't be made that simply redacts the few instances in which individuals whose privacy must be protected is redacted. MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor. We'll work on that. THE COURT: Okay. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, I'm happy to hear if there's additional -- I had that note to raise here for purposes of the video. Do you have that for other exhibits? MS. STERNHEIM: The individual exhibits are not as glaring to me as the video was, and viewing it in the context of the public not being aware of it, it sends an impression that this was like a domicile of debauchery, and there were a few pictures that maybe should not have been in the public domain, but 39 minutes of it should have been. THE COURT: I completely agree. MS. COMEY: That's understood, your Honor. We approached it this way to avoid having to pause and then turn to the side and then go back, but completely understood. And we will prepare a redacted version that can be released to the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012680",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 166 of 236 LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "reason most of that can't be a public document. And what you need to do, since narrow tailoring is required, is to make a public version so you redacted it to exclude the reading of the warrant. I don't see why a public version can't be made that simply redacts the few instances in which individuals whose privacy must be protected is redacted. MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor. We'll work on that. THE COURT: Okay. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, I'm happy to hear if there's additional -- I had that note to raise here for purposes of the video. Do you have that for other exhibits? MS. STERNHEIM: The individual exhibits are not as glaring to me as the video was, and viewing it in the context of the public not being aware of it, it sends an impression that this was like a domicile of debauchery, and there were a few pictures that maybe should not have been in the public domain, but 39 minutes of it should have been. THE COURT: I completely agree. MS. COMEY: That's understood, your Honor. We approached it this way to avoid having to pause and then turn to the side and then go back, but completely understood. And we will prepare a redacted version that can be released to the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012680",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012680"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}