mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012746.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "232",
    "document_number": "749",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 232 of 236 1136 LC3KMAX8\n\n1 MS. MOE: Your Honor, would the end of the day of midnight on Saturday be acceptable to the Court on timing?\n2 midnight on Saturday be acceptable to the Court on timing?\n3 THE COURT: Let's do 8:00 o'clock on Saturday for the government, 8:00 o'clock on Sunday for the defense, I'll take between 8:00 p.m. and Monday morning to read your papers and resolve it.\n4 government, 8:00 o'clock on Sunday for the defense, I'll take between 8:00 p.m. and Monday morning to read your papers and resolve it.\n5 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Everdell?\n7 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine for the defense.\n8 THE COURT: I received the first round of briefing on the attorney-client privilege issue from the defense.\n9 So the government's is due when?\n10 MR. ROHRBACH: Our brief is due on Monday right now, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: On Monday? I wanted to indicate, I know you raised that the witness' attorney might want to weigh in. So if they do, you can convey that they could put in a letter at that same timing.\n12 MR. ROHRBACH: We will. Thank you, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Okay.\n14 Redaction issues: As I indicated, I do want the video reviewed and a public version.\n15 I want to encourage also, I think a lot of the photos that came in, a lot of the exhibits that came in, could have redacted versions so that just the images of the witnesses who\n16 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012746",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 232 of 236 1136 LC3KMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MOE: Your Honor, would the end of the day of midnight on Saturday be acceptable to the Court on timing?\n2 midnight on Saturday be acceptable to the Court on timing?\n3 THE COURT: Let's do 8:00 o'clock on Saturday for the government, 8:00 o'clock on Sunday for the defense, I'll take between 8:00 p.m. and Monday morning to read your papers and resolve it.\n4 government, 8:00 o'clock on Sunday for the defense, I'll take between 8:00 p.m. and Monday morning to read your papers and resolve it.\n5 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Everdell?\n7 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine for the defense.\n8 THE COURT: I received the first round of briefing on the attorney-client privilege issue from the defense.\n9 So the government's is due when?\n10 MR. ROHRBACH: Our brief is due on Monday right now, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: On Monday? I wanted to indicate, I know you raised that the witness' attorney might want to weigh in. So if they do, you can convey that they could put in a letter at that same timing.\n12 MR. ROHRBACH: We will. Thank you, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Okay.\n14 Redaction issues: As I indicated, I do want the video reviewed and a public version.\n15 I want to encourage also, I think a lot of the photos that came in, a lot of the exhibits that came in, could have redacted versions so that just the images of the witnesses who",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012746",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "Saturday",
      "Sunday",
      "Monday",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "749",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012746"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}