| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "14",
- "document_number": "751",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 261 1154 LC6Cmax1\n\n1 MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: I note that, with my thanks to the government, the redacted photos of the 200 series were part of\n3 what the Court received in the supplemental production this\n4 morning, Ms. Comey.\n5 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. I think we would propose\n6 just to offer those formally at the beginning of the trial day\n7 when the jury comes in and then it can be released to the\n8 public.\n9\n10 THE COURT: Okay. Any objection to this that process,\n11 Mr. Everdell?\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we got them pretty late, we\n13 haven't a chance to review the redactions. I'm assuming\n14 they're fine, we don't have objection to process, we would just\n15 like a chance to look at them.\n16 THE COURT: Of course. Let us know when you've had a\n17 chance and they can be moved in front of the jury.\n18 I will ask, so going forward, any items that had been\n19 admitted in redaction form to the extent the witness or the\n20 jury is looking at the unredacted version, the government\n21 should show the public the redacted version.\n22 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.\n23 THE COURT: And going forward, on new exhibits, I\n24 think it should be, it's what I had imagined, but we're a\n25 little behind, that as the witness and the jury are looking at\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00012765",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 261 1154 LC6Cmax1",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012765",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: I note that, with my thanks to the government, the redacted photos of the 200 series were part of\n3 what the Court received in the supplemental production this\n4 morning, Ms. Comey.\n5 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. I think we would propose\n6 just to offer those formally at the beginning of the trial day\n7 when the jury comes in and then it can be released to the\n8 public.\n9\n10 THE COURT: Okay. Any objection to this that process,\n11 Mr. Everdell?\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we got them pretty late, we\n13 haven't a chance to review the redactions. I'm assuming\n14 they're fine, we don't have objection to process, we would just\n15 like a chance to look at them.\n16 THE COURT: Of course. Let us know when you've had a\n17 chance and they can be moved in front of the jury.\n18 I will ask, so going forward, any items that had been\n19 admitted in redaction form to the extent the witness or the\n20 jury is looking at the unredacted version, the government\n21 should show the public the redacted version.\n22 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.\n23 THE COURT: And going forward, on new exhibits, I\n24 think it should be, it's what I had imagined, but we're a\n25 little behind, that as the witness and the jury are looking at",
- "position": "main content"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Mr. Rohrbach",
- "Ms. Comey",
- "Mr. Everdell"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "751",
- "DOJ-OGR-00012765"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear and legible format. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The footer contains the name and contact information of the reporting agency and a unique identifier."
- }
|