mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012879.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "128",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 261 1289 LC6VMAX4\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would just say that it is not being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in issue and, therefore, it has relevance.\n2 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said.\n3 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact.\n4 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is something else. That's my understanding of it.\n5 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with him. If you want to redact the content and show that there were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she testified to.\n6 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates.\n7 THE COURT: Okay.\n8 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay.\n9 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with the content redacted.\n10 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And so --\n11 THE COURT: She did.\n12 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor.\n13 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012879",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 261 1289 LC6VMAX4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would just say that it is not being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in issue and, therefore, it has relevance.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is something else. That's my understanding of it.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with him. If you want to redact the content and show that there were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she testified to.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "7 THE COURT: Okay.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "8 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with the content redacted.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "10 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And so --",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11 THE COURT: She did.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "12 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012879",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. POMERANTZ"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012879"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the judge and lawyers about the admissibility of certain evidence. The transcript is well-formatted and easy to read."
}