mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012883.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "132",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 132 of 261 1293 LC6VMAX4\n1 THE COURT: Is there an objection?\n2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think --\n3 THE COURT: Microphone please.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Sorry, your Honor.\n5 I think it does defeat the purpose a bit of not\n6 admitting the exhibits just to have the agent testify about\n7 those very same --\n8 THE COURT: Are you talking about the agent?\n9 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, the agent who conducted the\n10 search.\n11 THE COURT: Oh, I misunderstood.\n12 No, you can't ask the agent unless -- for the same\n13 reason. Relevance has to be to the time period.\n14 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor. We just\n15 wanted to make sure we understood.\n16 THE COURT: Thank you for clarifying, Mr. Everdell.\n17 I thought you meant the current witness.\n18 MR. ROHRBACH: No, not the current witness.\n19 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: Thank you.\n21 Okay. What else? Anything?\n22 MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing from the government.\n23 Thank you.\n24 THE COURT: All right. Bring in the witness, please.\n25 And we'll bring in the jury.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012883",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 132 of 261 1293",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC6VMAX4",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Is there an objection?\n2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think --\n3 THE COURT: Microphone please.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Sorry, your Honor.\n5 I think it does defeat the purpose a bit of not\n6 admitting the exhibits just to have the agent testify about\n7 those very same --\n8 THE COURT: Are you talking about the agent?\n9 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, the agent who conducted the\n10 search.\n11 THE COURT: Oh, I misunderstood.\n12 No, you can't ask the agent unless -- for the same\n13 reason. Relevance has to be to the time period.\n14 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor. We just\n15 wanted to make sure we understood.\n16 THE COURT: Thank you for clarifying, Mr. Everdell.\n17 I thought you meant the current witness.\n18 MR. ROHRBACH: No, not the current witness.\n19 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: Thank you.\n21 Okay. What else? Anything?\n22 MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing from the government.\n23 Thank you.\n24 THE COURT: All right. Bring in the witness, please.\n25 And we'll bring in the jury.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012883",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MS. POMERANTZ"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012883"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}