DOJ-OGR-00012916.json 3.5 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "165",
  4. "document_number": "751",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 165 of 261 1326\nLC6Cmax5\nMcHugh - cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And if you look at page 6 of this document, and you look at\n3 the transactions on October 19th of 1999, which I think we\n4 looked at in your testimony in direct; is that right?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. That shows a sale of roughly $18.3 million and another\n7 transfer of the same amount on the same day; right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. So here's another example, is it not an account with many,\n10 many millions of dollars in an account that's controlled by\n11 Jeffrey Epstein; right?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. So I think it's fair to say he had a lot of money?\n14 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n15 THE COURT: Sustained.\n16 Q. Now, from your experience working with high net worth\n17 individuals, it's usually the case, isn't it, that people who\n18 have this much money don't have it all in one bank account;\n19 isn't that right?\n20 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Overruled.\n22 A. I don't know. It depends.\n23 Q. Well, some may, some may not, I suppose; right?\n24 MS. MOE: Objection to form.\n25 THE COURT: Overruled.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012916",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 165 of 261 1326",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC6Cmax5\nMcHugh - cross",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And if you look at page 6 of this document, and you look at\n3 the transactions on October 19th of 1999, which I think we\n4 looked at in your testimony in direct; is that right?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. That shows a sale of roughly $18.3 million and another\n7 transfer of the same amount on the same day; right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. So here's another example, is it not an account with many,\n10 many millions of dollars in an account that's controlled by\n11 Jeffrey Epstein; right?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. So I think it's fair to say he had a lot of money?\n14 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n15 THE COURT: Sustained.\n16 Q. Now, from your experience working with high net worth\n17 individuals, it's usually the case, isn't it, that people who\n18 have this much money don't have it all in one bank account;\n19 isn't that right?\n20 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Overruled.\n22 A. I don't know. It depends.\n23 Q. Well, some may, some may not, I suppose; right?\n24 MS. MOE: Objection to form.\n25 THE COURT: Overruled.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012916",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  41. "McHugh",
  42. "MS. MOE"
  43. ],
  44. "organizations": [
  45. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  46. ],
  47. "locations": [],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "October 19th of 1999",
  50. "08/10/22"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  54. "751",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00012916"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }